Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sequoia Healthcare Limited vs Tamil Nadu Medical Services ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 2695 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2695 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Sequoia Healthcare Limited vs Tamil Nadu Medical Services ... on 21 May, 2026

Author: G.R.Swaminathan
Bench: G. R. Swaminathan

WP No. 20315 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-05-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN

WP No. 20315 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 21778 OF 2026

1. Sequoia Healthcare Limited Rep by its Authorised Signatory P.Diwakar Reddy, Plot No. 27, Survey No.125 K.I.A.D.B.Industrial Area Chikkaballapur,Karnataka- 562101.

2. P.Diwakar Reddy Director, Sequoia Healthcare Limited Having Office at.

Plot No. 27, Survey No.125 K.I.A.D.B.Industrial Area Chikkaballapur,Karnataka- 562101.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited Under the Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu 417 Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai- 600 008 Tamil Nadu [email protected] ..Respondent(s)

__________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Prayer in WP No. 20315 of 2026: To call for the records of the Tender bearing Reference No.E1395/CT / RC/ TNMSC/ ENGG/ 2025 dated 19.08.2025 and the Subsequent Technical Evaluation Summary dated 14.05.2026 issued by the Respondent, and quash the same, and Consequently direct the Respondent to issue a fresh Tender by Calling for fresh bids without including the impugned condition and pass orders.

Prayer in WMP No.21778 of 2026: to stay all further proceedings pertaining to tender bearing reference No.E1395 /CT/RC/TNMSC/ENGG/2025 dated 19.08.2025 and the technical Evaluation summary dated 14.05.2026 issued by the respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.R.Rajagopalan Senior Counsel for Mr.Muthucharan Sundresh For Respondent(s): Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, Additional Government Pleader

Order

Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, learned Additional Government Pleader,

takes notice for respondent.

2. The learned Senior counsel for the writ petitioners pointed out that

the writ petitioner’s bid, submitted in response to the subject tender, has been

rejected on the ground that the petitioner does not possess a valid US FDA or __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

European certificate and therefore, the bid is non responsive. The learned

Senior counsel states that the petitioner is very much having Indian certification

viz., approval from the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO).

My attention was also drawn to OM No P-45014/33/2021-B.E-II (E-64737

dated 20.12.2022, which reads as follows:-

The undersigned is directed to state that repeated references are

being received in this Department for alleged violation of Public

Procurement (preference to make in India) order, 2017 (PPP-

MII Order). The Subject matter was reviewed in the 14 th Standing

Committee meeting held on 20.09.2022 (copy of minutes

enclosed) on implementation of PPP – MII order and it was

decided that:-

“DPIIT, DoE and GeM may jointly draft a common advisory to

be issued to all Ministries / Departments regarding nature of

grievances commonly observed in the tendering process.”

2. Accordingly, DPIIT in consultation with Department of

Expenditure and Gem has identified the “Common examples of

restrictive and discriminatory conditions against the local

suppliers and other conditions which make the bid non-compliant

to PPP-MII order, enclosed as Annexure A.

__________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. Is requested to kindly publicize above amongst all procuring

agencies under your control and direct them to ensure that their

tenders are compliant with PPP-MII Order and don’t include

restrictive and discriminatory conditions against the local

suppliers.

4. This issues with the approval of competent authority.

3. Prima facie, I am satisfied that the impugned condition in the

tender notification is unreasonable. When the policy of the Government is to

encourage local manufacturing, it does not appear to be in order to insist upon

foreign certification. The learned Senior counsel states that if an interim order is

not granted, the tender process will take place and the petitioner will be put to

irreparable loss and hardship. According to him, the financial bids are yet to be

opened. Thus, the balance of convenience is also in favour of the petitioner.

There shall be an order of interim stay as prayed for. This stay will hold good

till 30.06.2026. The writ petition to be listed for hearing on 03.06.2026.

21-05-2026 rka/dna

__________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.R.SWAMINATHAN J.

RKA

To Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited Under the Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu 417 Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai- 600 008 Tamil Nadu [email protected]

AND WMP NO. 21778 OF 2026

21-05-2026

__________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter