Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Santhosh vs The State Rep By
2026 Latest Caselaw 2577 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2577 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Santhosh vs The State Rep By on 14 May, 2026

                                                                               Crl.O.P.No.13030 of 2026
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14-05-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

CRL OP NO.13030 of 2026

Santhosh ... Petitioner/ Accused

Vs

The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, R-7 KK Nagar Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No.103 of 2026) ... Respondent

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.103 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Muthamizhselvakumar

For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.J. Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

*******

ORDER

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

09.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b),

115(2), 118(A), 309(4), 311, 125, 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.103 of 2026 on

the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with

other accused had abused the defacto complainant using filthy language and

robbed a sum of Rs.4,200/-. Hence, this case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that

petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He

further submitted that the petitioner is under judicial custody since

09.04.2026; that the co-accused were already enlarged on bail; and that the

petitioner is ready and willing to furnish substantial sureties and to abide by

any conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court and therefore, he

prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing

for the respondent police while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated

the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has three previous

cases; and that the investigation of this case is pending.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on either side, the

nature of offences, the money involved in this case, though the petitioner has

previous cases, he was granted bail in all those cases and taking note of the

duration of the custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet and on further conditions that;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023.

14.05.2026 stn

Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

QR code.

To

1. The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet.

2. The Inspector of Police, R-7 KK Nagar Police Station, Chennai District.

(Crime No.103 of 2026)

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

P. DHANABAL, J.

stn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

14.05.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter