Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Alaguraj vs The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police
2026 Latest Caselaw 2570 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2570 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Alaguraj vs The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police on 14 May, 2026

                                                                              Crl.O.P.No.13107 of 2026
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14-05-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

CRL OP NO.13107 of 2026

Alaguraj ... Petitioner/ Accused

Vs

The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Erode All Women Police Station. (Crime No.08 of 2026) ... Respondent

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.08 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Sri Janani For Mr. K. Rajkumar

For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.J. Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

*******

ORDER

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

11.03.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 11(2), 11(4), 11(5), 12,

13, 14(1) of POCSO Act, 2012 and under Section 67(B)(c) of I.T. Act in

Crime No.08 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the victim

girl were in love relationship since 2023, out of which the petitioner had

committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl. Hence, this case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that

petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He

further submitted that the petitioner is under judicial custody since

11.03.2026; and that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish substantial

sureties and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble

Court and therefore, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing

for the respondent police while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated

the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has no previous

antecedents.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on either side, the

nature of offences charged against the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner

has no previous cases and taking note of the age of the petitioner and the

period of incarceration undergone by him, this Court is inclined to grant bail

to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Sessions Court, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court) at Erode and on further conditions that;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023.

14.05.2026 stn

Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

QR code.

To

1. The Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram (Fast Track Mahila Court) at Erode.

2. The Inspector of Police, Erode All Women Police Station.

(Crime No.08 of 2026)

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

P. DHANABAL, J.

stn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

14.05.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter