Ammu vs The State Represented By, The Inspector ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 2410 Mad

Madras High Court

Ammu vs The State Represented By, The Inspector ... on 7 May, 2026

                                                                                Crl.O.P.No.11889 of 2026


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                        DATED: 07.05.2026

                                                            CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

                                                 Crl.O.P.No.11889 of 2026

                     Ammu                                                     ... Petitioner
                                                                 Vs.
                     The State represented by,
                     The Inspector of Police,
                     Kandili Police Station,
                     Tirupattur District.
                     (Crime No.122 of 2026)                                   ... Respondent

                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
                     Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in
                     the event of her arrest in Crime No.122 of 2026 pending investigation on
                     the file of the respondent police.

                                       For Petitioner      : Mr.R.Parthiban
                                       For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath
                                                        Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

                                                           ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the

respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2),

118(1), 296(b) and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.122 of 2026 on the file of

the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to prior enmity, the

accused abused the de facto complainant in filthy language, inflicted

injuries by assaulting him and also threatened him with dire

consequences. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner is innocent and a false complaint has been given against the

petitioner due to prior enmity. He also submitted that the petitioner is

ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this

Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for

the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for the

grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that the

injured was discharged from hospital.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and

the nature of the allegation and further taking note of the fact that the

injured was discharged from the hospital and the custody of the petitioner

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

is not required for further investigation, this Court is inclined to grant

anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in

the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days

from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned

Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirupattur, on condition that the petitioner

shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

only) with two sureties, each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the

respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the

petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further

condition that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required further interrogation;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond during during investigation or trial;

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

07.05.2026 ham

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirupattur.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kandili Police Station, Tirupattur District

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order on the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded on Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order, when uploaded on the official website of this Court, will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

ham

07.05.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis