Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2351 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2026
CRL OP No. 11806 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06-05-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
CRL.O.P.No.11806 of 2026
Sathish
S/o. Kothandan,
..Petitioner(s)
Vs.
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by
The Inspector of Police,
Kanchi Taluk Police Station,
Kancheepuram District. ..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of
BNSS Act, 2023, seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending case before
the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram case connected with PRC.No.18
of 2015 in Crime No.2 of 2012.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Illiyas
For Respondent(s): Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana
Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
31.03.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 302 of
I.P.C. r/w. 149 of I.P.C. in P.R.C.No.18 of 2015 connected with Crime No.2 of
2012 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
__________ Page1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2.It is the case of the petitioner that due to his non appearance before the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram, a Non Bailable Warrant was
issued against him on 14.07.2017 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial
custody on 31.03.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to dispute
between the rival groups, the petitioner was not able to appear before the Court.
Hence, NBW was issued against him on 14.07.2017 and he was remanded to
judicial custody on 31.03.2026. He would further submit that that the petitioner
has been suffering incarceration for a period of 56 days and he is ready to
cooperate with the investigation and he will appear before the respondent police
regularly. Learned counsel would further contend that the petitioner is ready to
abide by any condition that may be imposed on him by this Court.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would oppose for the
grant of bail on the ground that the case in PRC No.18 of 2015 was pending on
the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram for committal,
due to non appearance of the petitioner / accused, the case against him was split
up and Non Bailable Warrant was issued on 14.07.2017. The petitioner could
be secured and remanded to judicial custody only after a period of nine (9)
years. Hence he vehemently oppose for the grant of bail.
__________ Page2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner, without prejudice to his defence and contention is ready and willing
to deposit an amount of Rs.50,000/- to any association. Hence, he prays for
grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the
allegations and the submissions made by learned counsel on either side, and
taking note of the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner as well as
the fact that the petitioner has volunteered to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the
credit of the 'Tamil Nadu Advocates' Clerks Association, Chennai', this Court is
inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions.
8. The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty
Thousand only) to the Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerks Association, Chennai,
Account No. 484026006, Branch: Indian Bank High Court, IFSC
No.IDIB000M157 and on such deposit, the petitioner is ordered to be released
on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram and on further conditions
that:
__________ Page3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];
[f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
06-05-2026 nvi / kas
__________ Page4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
To:
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II Kancheepuram
2. The Superintendent Central Prison Puzhal
3.The Inspector of Police, Kanchi Taluk Police Station, Kancheepuram District.
4.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai 600 104.
__________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
nvi /kas
06-05-2026
__________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!