Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Pavalakkodi vs The District Collector
2026 Latest Caselaw 9 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 9 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Pavalakkodi vs The District Collector on 5 January, 2026

                                                                                       W.P.(MD)No.18055 of 2019

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED :05.01.2026

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

                                            W.P.(MD)No.18055 of 2019
                                                     and
                                           WMP (MD) No.16322 of 2019

                     1. M.Pavalakkodi

                     2. Ravichandran

                     3. Buvaneshwari

                     4. Manikandan                                                          ... Petitioner(s)

                                                                 Vs.


                     1. The District Collector,
                     Theni District.

                     2. The District Revenue Officer,
                     Theni District.

                     3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                     Uthamapalayam, Theni District.

                     4. The Tahsildar,
                     Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

                     5. Karuppiah

                     6. Vinoth Kumar

                     7. Ranjith Kumar

                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 06/01/2026 12:45:04 pm )
                                                                                             W.P.(MD)No.18055 of 2019

                     8. Ganeshwari
                     9. Kanagaraj
                     10. Thulasiammal
                     11. Pandiyan
                     12. Paulpandiyan
                     13. Muthuraj
                     14. Ramasamy
                     15. Pandiyammal
                     16. Rajakumari                                                          ... Respondent(s)

                     PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent
                     herein to issue change of patta for half share in 19 items of properties
                     scheduled in the Settlement Deed dated 19.5.1945 vide Doc.No.
                     1139/1945 subsequently sub-divided as 54 items of survey number, as
                     per the judgment and decree dated 9.9.1996 in SA No. 743 of 1992 on
                     the file of this Honourable Court and dismissal of suits filed by
                     respondents 5 to 16 herein in OS No. 185/2012 dated 22.11.2018, OS
                     No. 196/2012 dated 22.11.2018, OS No. 197/2012 dated 7.4.2016 and
                     OS.No. 198/2012 dated 22.11.2018 by the District Munsif Court,
                     Bodinayakanur.


                                  For Petitioner     : M/s.K.Appadurai
                                  For Respondents :Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian
                                                   Government Advocate for R1 to R4

                                                      Mr.A.Mohan for R6 to R13, R15 & R16

                                                      M/s.V.Janaki Ramulu for R14

                                                      R5 – No appearance



                     2/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 06/01/2026 12:45:04 pm )
                                                                                             W.P.(MD)No.18055 of 2019




                                                              ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of

mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue a change of patta for a

half share in 19 items of properties scheduled in the Settlement Deed

dated 19.05.1945, vide Doc. No. 1139/1945, subsequently sub-divided

into 54 items of survey numbers, as per the judgment and decree dated

09.09.1996 in S.A. No. 743 of 1992 on the file of this Honourable Court,

and the dismissal of suits filed by respondents 5 to 16 herein in O.S. No.

185 of 2012 dated 22.11.2018, O.S. No. 196 of 2012 dated 22.11.2018,

O.S. No. 197 of 2012 dated 07.04.2016, and O.S. No. 198 of 2012 dated

22.11.2018 by the District Munsif Court, Bodinayakanur.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that a

representation was made on 27.02.2019 for the purpose of effecting

changes in the patta. The basis for such representation includes the

conclusions arrived at in the suits filed before the civil courts and other

documents, including the settlement deed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/01/2026 12:45:04 pm )

3. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 16 submits

that the petitioner has suppressed various material aspects relating to the

civil suits.

4. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioners confined

his prayer to a direction to consider his representation dated 27.02.2019,

which was filed seeking issuance of patta, to which the learned

Government Advocate acceded.

5. In view of the same, this writ petition stands disposed of with a

direction to the second respondent/District Revenue Officer to consider

and pass orders on the representation dated 27.02.2019 after conducting

an inquiry, taking into consideration the pending civil suits between the

parties. Such inquiry shall be conducted after issuing notice to the

petitioners, the respondents 5 to 16 and all the other parties concerned,

recording objections, if any and shall be concluded within a period of

twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In view of

the order passed in this writ petition, taking note of the pending disputes

between the parties, there is no necessity to pass any further orders in the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/01/2026 12:45:04 pm )

connected miscellaneous petition in WMP (MD) No.16322 of 2022 and

accordingly, the said petition stands closed. No costs.




                                                                                       (K.SURENDER, J)
                                                                                            05.01.2026

                     NCC          :Yes/No
                     Internet     :Yes/No
                     Index        :Yes/No
                     PKN

                     To
                     1. The District Collector,
                     Theni District.

                     2. The District Revenue Officer,
                     Theni District.

                     3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                     Uthamapalayam, Theni District.

                     4. The Tahsildar,
                     Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 06/01/2026 12:45:04 pm )


                                                                             K.SURENDER, J.


                                                                                              PKN









                                                                                      05.01.2026







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/01/2026 12:45:04 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter