Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kavitha Ravanan vs The Additional Director General Of ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 47 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 47 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Kavitha Ravanan vs The Additional Director General Of ... on 6 January, 2026

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 06.01.2026

                                                           CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                                W.P.No.49014 of 2025


                     Kavitha Ravanan                                                     ... Petitioner
                                                               -vs-


                     1.The Additional Director General of Police,
                       Economic Offences Wing,
                       Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

                     2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                       Economic Offences Wing,
                       Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

                     3.The Inspector General of Registration,
                       Santhome, Chennai 600 028.

                     4.The Sub Registrar,
                       Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.                                     ... Respondents



                     PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

                     India, pleased to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring the order of

                     attachment dated 14.07.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent and the

                     consequential endorsement of attachment made in the 4th respondent’s record

                     1/5




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 07/01/2026 03:26:04 pm )
                     in respect of the petitioner’s property as illegal, arbitrary, ultravires and void

                     ab-initio and consequently direct the respondents to remove and cancel the

                     attachment entry subsisting in the 4th respondent’s records.




                                  For Petitioner         : Mr.D.Saikumarran

                                  For Respondents        : Mr.S.Sugendran,
                                        1, 2               Additional Public Prosecutor

                                  For Respondents        : Mr.U.Baranidharan,
                                        3, 4               Special Government Pleader

                                                                **********

                                                                   ORDER

The petitioner asserts that she is the owner of the property in Survey

No.1648/31 at Mylapore having purchased the same in sale deed bearing

Document No.3069 of 1995. Upon noticing that the encumbrance certificate

contains an entry to the effect that the property stands attached under order

dated 14.07.2023, the present writ petition has been filed seeking a

declaration that such adjudication is illegal and void ab initio.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/01/2026 03:26:04 pm )

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for the first

and second respondents. Learned Special Government Pleader accepts

notice for the third and fourth respondents. Learned Additional Public

Prosecutor submits that a communication dated 14.07.2023 under Section 91

of the Code of Criminal Procedure was issued to the Sub Registrar and that

the same has been reflected in the encumbrance certificate.

3. Learned Special Government Pleader referred to the judgment of

this Court in R.Madhupriya and another v. The Inspector General of

Registration and another 2020 SCC Online Madras 20112 (Madhupriya).

4. In Madhupriya, this Court referred to an earlier order dated

03.08.2020 in W.P.No.1680 of 2020. In the said order, this Court held that

registering authorities cannot refuse to register documents on the basis of

letters issued by the police unless an order of attachment is obtained from a

competent authority under the relevant enactment. At this juncture, it is

clear that there is no order of attachment. In view thereof, it is unnecessary

to issue the declaration that the petitioner prays for. By clarifying that this

order will not stand in the way of the first and second respondents obtaining

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/01/2026 03:26:04 pm ) an order of attachment or the petitioner registering any conveyances relating

to the property unless an order of attachment is obtained in the mean time,

the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

06.01.2026 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No

To

1.The Additional Director General of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

3.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai 600 028.

4.The Sub Registrar, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/01/2026 03:26:04 pm ) SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

rna

06.01.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/01/2026 03:26:04 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter