Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aquapump Industries vs Mr.Meet Jayeshbhai Patel
2026 Latest Caselaw 788 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 788 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Aquapump Industries vs Mr.Meet Jayeshbhai Patel on 25 February, 2026

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
                                                                                   C.S(COMM DIV) No. 317 of 2025


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED: 25-02-2026
                                                         CORAM
                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
                                         C.S(COMM DIV) No. 317 of 2025
                                         and O.A.Nos.1141 & 1142 of 2025
                                              and A.No.6107 of 2025

                1. Aquapump Industries
                   Tudiyalur Post, Coimbatore 641034 and also at
                   No. 184, old No.24, Linghi Chetty Street,
                   George Town, Chennai 600001
                   Rep by its Managing Partner
                   Mr. Ramaswamy Kumaravelu

                2. Aquasub Engineering
                   Tudiyalur Post, Coimbatore 641034 and also at
                   No. 184, old No.24, Linghi Chetty Street,
                   George Town, Chennai 600001
                   Rep by its Managing Partner
                   Mr. Ramaswamy Kumaravelu

                                                                                               ..Petitioner(s)
                                                              Vs
                Mr.Meet Jayeshbhai Patel
                Proprietor,
                Shukan Engineering Co.
                3, Paresh Estate, Opp.Sonya Ceramics,
                Anil Starch Road,
                Naroda-Road, Ahmedabad 382345
                Gujarat
                                                                                             ..Respondent(s)

                PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 O.S.Rules and Order VII Rule 1

                of the CPC Read With Sections 27, 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999,

                prays for Judgement and Decree as follows:-



                                                                                                    __________
                                                                                                     Page1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 01:38:19 pm )
                                                                                    C.S(COMM DIV) No. 317 of 2025


                          (a) Granting a permanent injunction, restraining the Defendant, by itself,

                their servants, agents, distributors, or anyone claiming through them from

                manufacturing, selling, advertising and offering for sale using the mark AQUA

                AERO and thereby infringing the Plaintiffs’ registered Trade Marks AQUA

                GROUP/ AQUA GROUP,. TEXMO, AQUATEX, AQUA GROUP TEXMO,

                AQUA GROUP – AQUATEX, AQUASUB, AQUASUB ENGINEERING,

                AQUAPUMP & AQUAPUMP INDUSTRIES as such or prefix or suffix in any

                Pumps and Motors or in any other goods manufactured and sold by the

                Defendant or its trading style or in any media and use the same in invoices,

                letter heads and visiting cards or by using any other trade mark which is in any

                way visually, or phonetically identical or similar to the Plaintiffs registered

                Trade Marks under Nos. 315049 (SP-I) (SP-II), 315050 (SP-I) (SP-II)

                renumbered as 2702778, 2702779, 2702780, 2702781, 762990, 1214570,

                1280903, 1280904, 1285017, 1285018, 1409010, 1453388, 1598337, 1961986,

                1961987, 1983236, 3815294 & 3815295 or in any manner infringing the

                Plaintiffs’ Registered Trade Marks by using AQUA AERO, TEXMO, AQUA

                and other Aqua formative marks.



                          (b) Granting a permanent injunction, restraining the Defendant, by itself,

                their servants, agents, distributors, or anyone claiming through them from

                manufacturing, selling, advertising and offering for sale using the Trade Marks

                AQUA AERO or AQUA GROUP/AQUA GROUP, TEXMO, AQUATEX,

                                                                                                     __________
                                                                                                      Page2 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 01:38:19 pm )
                                                                                    C.S(COMM DIV) No. 317 of 2025


                AQUA GROUP TEXMO, AQUA GROUP – AQUATEX, AQUASUB,

                AQUASUB ENGINEERING, AQUAPUMP & AQUAPUMP INDUSTRIES as

                such or with prefix or suffix in any Pumps and Motors any other goods

                manufactured and sold by the Defendant and its trading style or in any media

                and use the same in invoices, letter heads and visiting cards or by using any

                other trade mark which is in any way visually, or phonetically similar to the

                Plaintiffs Trade Marks AQUA GROUP / AQUA GROUP, TEXMO,

                AQUATEX, AQUA GROUP TEXMO, AQUA GROUP – AQUATEX,

                AQUASUB, AQUASUB ENGINEERING, AQUAPUMP & AQUAPUMP

                INDUSTRIES or in any manner pass off the Plaintiffs goods.



                          (c) Directing the Defendant to surrender to the Plaintiffs all the goods,

                packing materials, cartons, advertisement materials and hoardings, letter-heads,

                visiting cards, office stationery and all other materials containing/bearing the

                Trade Mark AQUA AERO or other marks deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs

                Trademark TEXMO, AQUA and Aqua formative marks,



                          (d) Directing the Defendant to render an account of profits made by them

                by the use of the impugned trademark AQUA AERO on the goods referred

                prayer (a) & (b) and decree the suit for the profits found to have been made by

                the Defendant, after the Defendant has rendered accounts.



                                                                                                     __________
                                                                                                      Page3 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 01:38:19 pm )
                                                                                        C.S(COMM DIV) No. 317 of 2025


                          (e) Directing the Defendant to pay to the Plaintiffs the costs of the suit.



                              For Plaintiff(s):               Ms.Gladys Daniel
                                                              for Mr.C.Daniel

                              For Respondent(s):              M/s.Rajan J. Patel

                                                              ***********


                                                          JUDGMENT

The suit was instituted for remedies in respect of alleged trade mark

infringement and passing off. Pursuant to negotiations, parties reached a

settlement. Memorandum of Compromise dated 06.02.2026 has been filed.

Such memorandum of compromise has been signed by the Managing Partner of

the first and second plaintiffs, the Proprietor of Shukan Engineering Company

and by the respective counsel.

2. The defendant has agreed to submit to a decree in terms of reliefs

claimed in clauses (a) and (b) of paragraph 26 of the plaint. The defendant has

also agreed to withdraw / cancel the registered trade mark AQUAAERO under

Trade Mark No.5573625 and has agreed not to make any further application for

registration of the marks indicated in paragraph 5. The defendant has further

agreed not to assert any right in the trade marks mentioned in paragraph 6 of the

memorandum of compromise. The plaintiff has agreed to give up the reliefs

claimed in clauses (c) to (f) of paragraph 26 of the plaint.

__________ Page4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 01:38:19 pm )

3. I see no legal impediment to the issuance of a decree in terms of the

memorandum of compromise.

4. Therefore, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.317 of 2025 is decreed in terms of

memorandum of compromise dated 06.02.2026, which shall form an integral

part of the decree. In view of the settlement, there will be no order as to costs.

Consequently, the connected applications are closed.

25-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA

__________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 01:38:19 pm )

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

RNA

and O.A.Nos.1141 & 1142 of 2025

25-02-2026

__________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 01:38:19 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter