Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Swaminathan vs The Managing Director
2026 Latest Caselaw 728 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 728 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

V.Swaminathan vs The Managing Director on 24 February, 2026

Author: B.Pugalendhi
Bench: B.Pugalendhi
                                                                                     W.P(MD)No.4927 of 2026


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 24.02.2026

                                                      CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                          W.P(MD)No.4927 of 2026

                     V.Swaminathan                                                      ... Petitioner

                                                            Vs
                     1.The Managing Director,
                       State Express Transport Corporation Ltd,
                       Thiruvalluvar Illam,
                       Pallavan Salai,
                       Chennai 600 002.

                     2.The Administrator,
                       Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Trust,
                       Thiruvalluvar Illam,
                       Pallavan Salai,
                       Chennai 600 002.     .                         ...Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                     of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of                     MANDAMUS
                     directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6 percent per
                     annum to petitioner for the belated payment of Gratuity, Provident
                     fund, EL Surrender, Leave salary and Pension Commutation from
                     the date of retirement to the date of actual payment within a time
                     frame as may be fixed by this Court.

                     1/7




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis            ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 09:28:11 pm )
                                                                                      W.P(MD)No.4927 of 2026




                                  For Petitioner           : Mrs.D.Ramya
                                  For Respondents          : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh
                                                             Standing Counsel

                                                        ORDER

This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, directing the

respondents to pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per

annum for the belated payment of terminal benefits for the period

from the date of retirement to the date of actual disbursement, within

the time stipulated by this Court.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he joined as a Driver

in the respondent Transport Corporation on 01.10.1995 and he

retired from service as Selection Grade Driver on 30.04.2024.

However, the retirement benefits, namely, Provident Fund, Gratuity

and encashment of leave were settled to him only on 25.08.2025.

Since the benefits have been settled belatedly, the respondent is

liable to pay interest for the belated payment. Therefore, the

petitioner gave a representation dated 19.02.2026 to the respondent,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 09:28:11 pm )

however, the same did not evoke any response. Therefore, the

petitioner has filed this writ petition for the above said relief.

3.Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned Standing Counsel takes

notice for the respondents and submits that the terminal benefits

have been settled to this petitioner, however, belatedly.

4. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is

taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

5. This Court paid its anxious consideration to the rival

submissions made and also perused the materials placed on record.

6. The employer is liable to settle the retirement benefits

to its employees without any delay and in case, if it is settled

belatedly, it has to be compensated by way of interest for the belated

payment. In this regard, the Hon'ble Apex Court in S.K.Dua vs.

State of Haryana reported in 2008 (3) SCC 44, has held as follows:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 09:28:11 pm )

“14. In the circumstances, prima facie, we are of the view that the grievance voiced by the appellant appears to be well founded that he would be entitled to interest on such benefits. If there are statutory rules occupying the field, the appellant could claim payment of interest relying on such rules. If there are administrative instructions, guidelines or norms prescribed for the purpose, the appellant may claim benefit of interest on that basis. But even in absence of statutory rules, administrative instructions or guidelines, an employee can claim interest under Part III of the Constitution relying on Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, that retiral benefits are not in the nature of “bounty” is, in our opinion well founded and needs no authority in support thereof. In that view of the matter, in our considered opinion, the High Court was not right in dismissing the petition in living even without issuing notice to the respondents.”

7. Following the same, in a similar issue, a Division

Bench of this Court, in W.A.(MD)No.403 of 2010, etc. batch, vide

common order dated 04.07.2014, has fixed the rate of interest at 6%

per annum and held as under:-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 09:28:11 pm )

“5. ..... even though there is no provision in the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund for payment of interest, cannot stand in the light of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in S.K.Dua v. State of Haryana and another, reported in (2008) 3 SCC 44. As a matter of fact, the Rules do not contemplate belated payment of retirement benefits. The Rules contemplate prompt payment. When the Rules contemplate prompt payment and not bleated payment, the Rules will not contain a provision for payment of interest. The Pension Fund which was created as a Trust by the Corporation was supposed to act in trust for the employees' benefit. If the Trust could not make payments within the time stipulated, then, irrespective of whether there is any provision for payment of interest or not, the Corporation is obliged to make payment.”

8. Following the dictum laid down on this issue, the

writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the

respondent/Transport Corporation to pay interest for the belated

payment of retirement benefits at the rate of 6% per annum from the

date of retirement till the date of actual disbursement, within a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 09:28:11 pm )

period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

No costs.

24.02.2026

NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn

To

1.The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation Ltd, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002.

2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 09:28:11 pm )

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

vrn

Order made in

24.02.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 09:28:11 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter