Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1641 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026
WP No. 36005 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07-04-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WP No. 36005 of 2024
Shakkthi,
S/o. Palanisamy,
Door No. 2/439, West Street,
Kanakkampalayam Village,
Tiruppur Taluk,Tiruppur.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector
Coimbatore District.
2.The Thasildar,
J.Krisnapuram Village, Sulur Taluk,
Coimbatore District.
3.The District Surveyor,
J.Krishnapuram Village, Sulur Tlauk,
Coimbatore District.
4.The Inspector Of Police,
Sulthanpettai Police Station,
Coimbatore District.
5. R.Saraswathy
W/o.Raju
Door No.3/120(1),
J.Krishnapuram Sulur Taluk
Coimbatore District.
R5- impleaded as per order passed in
WMP.No.11419 of 2026 dated 07.04.2026
Respondent(s)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 36005 of 2024
PRAYER
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying
to issue a Writ of Mandamus, Directing the 2nd and 3rd Respondent to take
steps to measure and demarcate the property being all that piece and and parcel
of land in J.Krishnapuram Village, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District comprised
in Old S.No. 302/1 New S.No. 302/1C to an extent of 1.22 Acres to put the
fencing the property with aid of 4th respondent within a time frame fixed by this
Honble Court
For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Selvam
For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 3
Dr.C.E.Pratap, GA for R4
Mr.R.T.Vishnu for R5
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent to take
steps to measure and demarcate the property being all that piece and and parcel
of land in J.Krishnapuram Village, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District comprised
in Old S.No. 302/1 New S.No. 302/1C to an extent of 1.22 Acres to put the
fencing the property with aid of 4th respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case,
both the petitioner and the 5th respondent had already filed a suit for declaration
and permanent injunction and the same is pending. Under these circumstances,
the petitioner filed an application before the respondents to measure the subject
land and lay survey stones therein. According to the petitioner, the said process
will no way affect the interest of the private respondents. Hence, this petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the private
respondents would submit that since the suit is already pending, the process of
measuring the property and laying survey stones therein will create unnecessary
issues. Further, he would suggest that if there is any necessity for measuring the
subject land, the petitioner shall approach the Civil Court, where the suit is
pending, and file an appropriate application. Hence, he prays for dismissal of
this petition.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and
also perused the entire materials available on record.
5. In the case on hand, both the petitioner and the 5th respondent had
already filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction and the same is
pending. Under these circumstances, the petitioner filed an application before
the respondents to measure the subject land and lay survey stones therein.
6. There is no impediment for this Court to pass orders directing the
official respondents to survey the subject land. However, passing of such order
would definitely create a panic situation due to the pendency of suit between the
parties. In such case, it is clear that entertaining this petition is nothing but an
act of encouraging the dispute between the parties. Therefore, to avoid the
same, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
7. As rightly contended by the private respondents, since the suit filed by
both the parties are pending before the Civil Court, now the right course
available to the petitioner is to approach the said Civil Court by way of filing an
application, to conduct survey at the subject property.
8. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. No cost. The liberty is
granted to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for appropriate orders.
07-04-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To
1.The District Collector Coimbatore District.
2.The Thasildar, J.Krisnapuram Village, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District.
3.The District Surveyor, J.Krishnapuram Village, Sulur Tlauk, Coimbatore District.
4.The Inspector Of Police, Sulthanpettai Police Station, Coimbatore District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.
nsa
07-04-2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!