Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Pappathi vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2025 Latest Caselaw 7004 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7004 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2025

Madras High Court

R.Pappathi vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 12 September, 2025

                                                                                                  W.P.No.31986 of 2017

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED: 12/9/2025

                                                            CORAM

                                     THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

                                             Writ Petition No.31986 of 2017
                                                           and
                                        W.M.P.Nos.35143 of 2017 and 4415 of 2018

                     R.Pappathi                                     ...                  Petitioner

                                                                  Vs

                     1. The Government of Tamil Nadu
                        rep. By The Secretary to Government
                        P & AR Department
                        Fort St. George
                        Chennai 600 009.

                     2. The Secretary to Government
                        School Education Department
                        Fort St. George
                        Chennai 600 009.

                     3. The Director of Elementary Education
                        College Road
                        Chennai 600 009.


                     1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )
                                                                                                       W.P.No.31986 of 2017

                     4. The District Elementary Educational Officer
                        Namakkal District
                        Namakkal.

                     5. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer
                        Namakkal District
                        Namakkal.                        ...         Respondents

                                  Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying

                     for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records

                     of            the    third   and     fifth      respondents              respectively   issued     in

                     Na.Ka.No.16907/E1/2016 dated 11/8/2016 and in ATM.No.980/A1/2015

                     dated 23/10/2015 and quash the same and issue a consequential direction to

                     the respondents to step up the petitioner's pay to the level of his junior and

                     fix the same at Rs.18190 + 4500 GP as on 1/6/2011 and at Rs.21060 + 4700

                     GP as on 1/10/2013, as per G.O.Ms.No.25 P and AR Department dated

                     23/3/2015 and as per Tamil Nadu Revised Pay Scale Rule, 1998 and grant

                     arrears of pay and other consequential benefits.



                                         For petitioner                  ...       Mr.R.Saseetharan

                                         For respondents                 ...       Mr.P.Rajarajeswari
                                                                                   Government Advocate


                     2/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                     ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )
                                                                                                W.P.No.31986 of 2017

                                                                ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to quash the orders dated 11/8/2016

and 23/10/2015 of the third and fifth respondents issued in

Na.Ka.No.16907/E1/2016 and ATM.No.980/A1/2015, respectively, and

issue a consequential direction to the respondents to step up the petitioner's

pay to the level of his junior and fix the same at Rs.18190 + 4500 GP as on

1/6/2011 and Rs.21060 + 4700 GP as on 1/10/2013, as per G.O.Ms.No.25 P

and AR Department dated 23/3/2015 and Tamil Nadu Revised Pay Scale

Rule, 1998 and grant arrears of pay and other consequential benefits.

2. The facts of the case which are necessary for the disposal of the

writ petition are as follows:-

The petitioner was initially appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher on

1/7/1988 in Panchayat Union Elementary School Parappatti, Mecheri

Union, Salem District and thereafter, promoted as Primary School

Headmistress on 25/6/1999 and later promoted as B.Ed Middle School

Headmaster on 1/6/2008 from the post of B.T.Assistant.

3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that her junior

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )

Mrs.M.Jayakodi, who has also comparatively the same experience to that

of the petitioner was promoted, after she had been granted Selection Grade

Pay, while serving as Primary School Headmistress.

4. Heard Mr.R.Saseetharan, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Ms.P.Rajarajeswari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

5. According to the petitioner, the very object of G.O.Ms.No.25 P &

AR Department (FR IV Department) dated 23/3/2015, was to rectify the

anomaly with respect to the promotion from ordinary grade to selection

grade post and the junior drawing more pay than the senior.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit

that the said Jayakodi was part of another Union as such the pay scale of the

said Jayakodi cannot be implemented in so far as the petitioner is

concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )

7. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner brought to the

notice of this Court to a judgment dated 22/8/2023, made in (P.SANTHI

Vs. 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, REP. BY THE

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, P & AR DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.

GEORGE, CHENNAI 9), wherein the learned Single Judge under similar

circumstances has directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders to

step up the pay of the petitioner therein on par with the junior who was

promoted and drawing more pay, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.25.

8. Assailing the above said order, the Government has filed Writ

Appeal in W.A.No.1623 of 2024, (1. The Secretary to Government,

School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9 and 3 others

Vs P.Santhi), wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench has dismissed the Writ

Appeal, confirming the order passed by the learned Single Judge.

9. The main object of G.O.Ms.No.25 P & AR Department (FR IV

Department) dated 23/3/2015, is to rectify the pay anomaly due to Junior

drawing more pay than the senior in cases where the senior got promotion

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )

before moving to Selection Grade/Special Grade and the junior got

promotion after moving to Selection Grade/Special Grade in the revised

scales of pay, drawing more pay, as a result of introduction of Tamil Nadu

Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 2009. The question of rectifying the anomaly

in such cases was carefully examined by the Government and passed

G.O.Ms.No.25.

10. The ground raised by the respondents that the petitioner was part

of another Union cannot be sustained. G.O.Ms.No.25 makes it clear that a

senior getting lesser pay than his/her junior due to the promotion of the

junior after moving to selection grade, has to be stepped up and make it

equal to pay of the junior.

11. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner and Jayakodi are serving

in the same Department and Jayakodi is junior to the petitioner. It would

only be appropriate that the petitioner's pay should be fixed as equal to the

pay of M.Jayakodi, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.25. Even a bare perusal

of the judgment, made in W.A.No.1623 of 2024, and G.O.Ms.No.25, would

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )

make it clear that the order impugned is unsustainable in law.

11. Accordingly, this writ petition stands allowed and the

respondents are directed to set right the pay anomaly and step-up the pay of

the petitioner on a par with the said M.Jayakodi, in accordance with

G.O.Ms.No.25 P & AR Department (FR IV Department) dated 23/3/2015.

The said exercise has to be carried out within a period of eight weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the respondents require any

clarification, they may issue notice to the petitioner and seek necessary

clarification and but at any rate pass orders within a period of four months.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

(K.SURENDER,J) 12th September, 2025 mvs.

Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

K.SURENDER, J

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )

mvs.

To

1. The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu P & AR Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Secretary to Government School Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

3. The Director of Elementary Education College Road, Chennai 600 009.

4. The District Elementary Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.

5. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.

12/9/2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/09/2025 06:56:34 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter