Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

C.Arvind Babu vs R.Praneswari @ Priya
2025 Latest Caselaw 7855 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7855 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2025

Madras High Court

C.Arvind Babu vs R.Praneswari @ Priya on 15 October, 2025

Author: S.M.Subramaniam
Bench: S. M. Subramaniam, Mohammed Shaffiq
    2025:MHC:2412
                                                                                          OSA No. 329 of 2025




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED: 15-10-2025

                                                             CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
                                                 AND
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                                  OSA No. 329 of 2025

                C.Arvind Babu
                                                                                          Appellant(s)

                                                                 Vs

                R.Praneswari @ Priya
                                                                                          Respondent(s)

                PRAYER

                Original Side Appeal has been filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original

                Side Rules, 1994 and Clause 15 of Letters Patent of 1865, praying to set

                aside fair and decretal order 03.01.2025, passed in O.P.No.516 of 2024.


                                  For Appellant(s):       Mrs.Geeta Ramaseshan

                                  For Respondent(s): Mr..Krishna Ravindran




                Page 1 of 6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                 ( Uploaded on: 22/10/2025 07:18:57 pm )
                                                                                        OSA No. 329 of 2025


                                                    JUDGMENT

(Judgment was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

The present Original Side Appeal has been instituted challenging the

rd order dated 3 January, 2025 passed in O.P.No.516 of 2024. The petitioner is

the appellant before this Court. He preferred an O.P. to declare him as a

guardian of his minor daughter Tanvi and grant permanent custody of the

minor.

2. The learned Single Judge dismissed the petition on the ground that

the minor girl is aged about 4 years and presently with custody of her mother.

3. Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

enumerates that “in the case of a boy or an unmarried girl – the father, and

after him, the mother; provided that the custody of a minor who has not

completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother”.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/10/2025 07:18:57 pm )

4. Since the minor girl is 4 ½ years old, the learned Single Judge is right

in dismissing the petition on the ground that the child is with the custody of the

mother right from her birth.

5. The learned counsel for the appellant would mainly contend that both

the parties are well educated and placed in a better position. The appellant is

a Doctor, who is a specialist in Ophthalmology. The respondent/mother is

working as a Director in a Company.

6. The appellant states that it would be suffice, if he is permitted to have

visitation right. To prove his bonafide, he undertakes to deposit a sum of Rs.15

Lakhs within a period of one (1) week from today and the said amount will be

deposited in any one of the Nationalised Bank under interest bearing deposit

scheme in the name of the minor girl Tanvi. Another Rs.15 Lakhs will be

deposited within a period of six (6) months from today in the name of the

minor girl in the same Nationalised Bank, and the deposits will be renewed

periodically until the minor attains the age of majority.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/10/2025 07:18:57 pm )

7. The respondent/mother has no serious objections to provide

visitation right. The parties have now agreed that visitation right may be

nd th exercised twice in a month i.e., every 2 and 4 Saturdays of English

Calender month at Happy Hub, Mandaveli, Canal Bank Road, RA Puram,

Chennai, from 01:00 P.M to 3:00 P.M. The parties both present before this

Court agreed that they will honor their undertaking given before this Court.

The respondent would also submit that she will be liberal in respect of the time

limit, if the child is willing to spend more time with her father.

8. In view of the said understanding between the parties, no further

adjudication needs to be undertaken. Consequently, the order dated

03.01.2025, passed in O.P.No.516 of 2024, stands modified to the extent of

providing visitation rights to the appellant as stated above.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/10/2025 07:18:57 pm )

9. Accordingly, the Original Side Appeal stands disposed of. No cost.

(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J.) 15-10-2025

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

Jeni

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/10/2025 07:18:57 pm )

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.

AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J.

Jeni

15-10-2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/10/2025 07:18:57 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter