Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Anbugnanam vs Nallur Sekaram
2025 Latest Caselaw 4148 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4148 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2025

Madras High Court

A.Anbugnanam vs Nallur Sekaram on 19 March, 2025

Author: R.Vijayakumar
Bench: R.Vijayakumar
                                                                                              C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1689 of 2024




                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
                                                       DATED: 19.03.2025
                                                                CORAM
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
                                             C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1689 of 2024
                                             and CMP(MD).No.9867 of 2024


                   A.Anbugnanam                             .... Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant

                                                                    -vs-

                   Nallur Sekaram
                   Represented by its
                   President
                   Mr.B.E.Wilson                            ....Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff

                   PRAYER: The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of
                   Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order 03.02.2023
                   passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.113 of 2022 on the file of the Distrit
                   Munsif Court, Alangulam and allow this civil revision petition.


                                   For Petitioner            : Mr.A.Sankararamasubramanian


                                                            ORDER

The defendant in O.S.No.113 of 2022 on the file of the District

Munsif Court, Alangulam has filed the present civil revision petition

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 07:03:42 pm ) C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1689 of 2024

challenging the dismissal of application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of

C.P.C

2.A perusal of the record reveals that the respondent herein as

plaintiff has filed the above said suit for the relief of recovery of

possession and recovery of rental arrears and damages.

3.As per plaint averments, the defendant is the tenant of the

property and he had not paid the rent and therefore, the suit for recovery of

possession has been filed.

4.Pending suit, the defendant has filed I.A.No.1 of 2022 to reject

the plaint primarily on the ground that previously the defendant had filed

O.S.No.463 of 2014 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tenkasi for

the relief of permanent injunction as against the present plaintiff and the

suit was decreed on 15.02.2016. Suppressing the same, the present suit for

recovery of possession has been filed. This application came to be

dismissed by the trial Court on the ground that the defendant has not

enclosed the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.463 of 2014.

Challenging the same, the present civil revision petition has been filed.

5.According to the learned counsel for the revision petitioner,

when there is suppression of the material fact, the suit should be

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 07:03:42 pm ) C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1689 of 2024

dismissed. The plaintiff has relied upon a judgment of this Court reported

in 2020 (3) MWN (Civil) 535 (U.Chitra Vs. K.N.Bhaskar) in support of

his contention.

6.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner.

7.The defendant in the suit has filed an application for rejection

of plaint primarily on the ground that the plaintiff having suffered a decree

in O.S.No.463 of 2014, has filed the present suit suppressing the said fact.

Even assuming that he has suppressed the decree for permanent injunction,

that would not be a bar for the plaintiff to seek recovery of possession. The

defendant has not chosen to file the judgment and decree in O.S.No.463 of

2014 either before the trial Court or before this Court. The judgement cited

by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not applicable to the facts and

circumstances of the present case.

8.As far as the plea of non-joinder of Tirunelveli Diocese is

concerned, the same can be raised by the defendant in his written

statement.

9.In view of the above said facts, the trial Court has rightly

rejected the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. with liberty

to the petitioner to raise all the issue during trial.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 07:03:42 pm ) C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1689 of 2024

10.With the above said observations, this civil revision petition

is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition

is closed.

19.03.2025

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No msa

To

1.The District Magistrate Court, Alangulam

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 07:03:42 pm ) C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1689 of 2024

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J

msa

C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1689 of 2024

19.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 07:03:42 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter