Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Thamburaj vs The District Collector/Assistant ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 3427 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3427 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2025

Madras High Court

S.Thamburaj vs The District Collector/Assistant ... on 28 February, 2025

Author: N. Anand Venkatesh
Bench: N. Anand Venkatesh
                                                                                         W.P.No.37117 of 2024


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 28.02.2025

                                                              CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

                                                 W.P.No.37117 of 2024
                                                         AND
                                         W.M.P.Nos.40116 of 2024 & 6964 of 2025



                S.Thamburaj                                                                 .. Petitioner
                                                         Vs
                1.The District Collector/Assistant Inspector General
                Registration Department
                Collectorate Campus, Coimbatore

                2.The Sub Registrar
                Ganapathy, Coimbatore North Taluk
                Coimbatore

                3.The District Revenue Officer
                Coimbatore
                Coimbatore District

                4.The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Sub Collector
                Coimbatore North
                Coimbatore


                1/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )
                                                                                            W.P.No.37117 of 2024


                5.Anusha Rajinikanth
                Rep. through her Power Agent
                M.P.Raja Suresh                                                          .. Respondents

                          Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for
                                                                                nd
                issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the 2 respondent from registering the

                sale deed vide document No.P29 and P30 of 2018 presented on 05.09.2018 in

                view of the representation made by the petitioner dated 30.10.2024, 22.11.2024.

                                     For Petitioner          : Mr.P.Tamilavel
                                     For RR1 & 2             : Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath
                                                               Government Advocate
                                     For R5                  : Mr.Sriram
                                                               Senior Counsel for Mr.J.Varun



                                                            ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus

forbearing the respondents from registering the sale deed pending in document

Nos.P29 and P30 of 2018 presented on 05.09.2018, in view of the representation

made by the petitioner.

2. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )

3. The submissions were made on the side of the petitioner touching upon

the merits of the case, with a specific plea that the private respondent does not have

any right or title over the subject property.

4. This Court need not go into the merits of the case, in view of certain

subsequent developments that have been taken place in this case. The private

respondent had earlier filed a writ petition in W.P.No.12742 of 2022, challenging

the proceedings of the Sub Registrar dated 07.04.2022, refusing to entertain the

sale deeds and for a consequential direction to the Sub Registrar to register the

documents which are kept pending in document Nos.P29 and P30 of 2018. This

writ petition was disposed of by an order dated 13.05.2022. The relevant portion

in the order is extracted herein:

“8. I therefore hold that the second respondent could not have refused to register the sale deed presented by the writ petitioner. Accordingly, the order impugned in the writ petition is set aside and the writ petition is allowed. The second respondent is directed to register the petition mentioned sale deed subject to compliance of other formalities.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )

9. I place on record the undertaking given by the writ petitioner through her counsel that the petitioner would not alienate or encumber the subject property in any manner till the revenue proceedings attain finality.

No costs.”

5. As against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.12742

of 2022, two appeals came to be filed. One appeal was filed by Palanisamy in

W.A.No.2504 of 2023. The other appeal was filed by the Registration Department

in W.A.No.1882 of 2023. Insofar as the appeal filed by Palanisamy, it was

dismissed as withdrawn, by an order dated 06.06.2024. Insofar as the appeal filed

by the Registration Department, the writ appeal came to be dismissed, by an order

dated 13.06.2024 and as a result, the order passed by the learned Single Judge in

W.P.No.12742 of 2022 was confirmed.

6. In the light of the above order, the relief as sought for by the petitioner,

cannot be sustained. Already there is a direction issued by the learned Single

Judge of this Court to register the documents that were pending in document

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )

Nos.P29 and P30 of 2018. This order has been confirmed in the writ appeal.

While so, if another learned Single Judge of this Court allows this writ petition and

grants the relief as sought for by the petitioner, it will be running contrary to the

earlier direction issued by the learned Single Judge, which direction was

subsequently confirmed by the Division Bench. Judicial discipline requires that

while dealing with a writ petition, the Court must look into the relief that has been

sought for in the writ petition and see if such a relief can be granted. The relief as

sought for in this writ petition will not survive, in view of the order dated

13.05.2022 that was passed in W.P.No.12742 of 2022, which was subsequently

confirmed by the Division Bench in W.A.No.1882 of 2023 by judgment dated

13.06.2024.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner was repeatedly harping upon the

issue regarding the right and title over the property and was contending that the

private respondent did not have any semblance of right over the property. The

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )

issue raised in the present writ petition must be considered in line with the relief

that has been sought for in this writ petition. Even if this Court is to agree with the

stand taken by the petitinoer to the effect that the private respondent does not have

the right or title over the property, it will not be possible to grant the relief as

sought for in this writ petition, in view of the order dated 13.05.2022 passed in

W.P.No.12742 of 2022, which was confirmed in W.A.No.1882 of 2023 by

judgment dated 13.06.2024.

8. In the result, this writ petition stands dismissed and it is left open to the

petitioner to work out his remedy in the pending suit O.S.No.1415 of 2018 on the

file of the I Additional District Court, Coimbatore. The mere registration of the

sale deed or any of the observations that were made in the earlier orders passed by

this Court and also in the present order, will have no bearing in the civil Court

deciding the inter se right and title of the parties in the pending civil suit. All the

grounds can be raised before the civil Court and the same will be considered on its

own merits and in accordance with law. The earlier orders that were passed and the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )

present order that was passed in this writ petition merely confines itself to the

registration of the sale deed before the registering authority and there is nothing

further touching upon the right and title over the property. No costs. Connected

W.M.P.s are closed.

28.02.2025 gya Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

To

1.The District Collector/Assistant Inspector General Registration Department Collectorate Campus, Coimbatore

2.The Sub Registrar Ganapathy, Coimbatore North Taluk Coimbatore

3.The District Revenue Officer Coimbatore, Coimbatore District

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Sub Collector Coimbatore North Coimbatore

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

gya

28.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/03/2025 01:31:12 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter