Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Assistant Commissioner (St)(Fac) vs S.R.Raja Agencies
2025 Latest Caselaw 2965 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2965 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2025

Madras High Court

The Assistant Commissioner (St)(Fac) vs S.R.Raja Agencies on 18 February, 2025

Author: Mohammed Shaffiq
Bench: Mohammed Shaffiq
                                                                                  W.A.No.1550 of 2022



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED:    18.02.2025

                                                        CORAM :

                                     THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                            AND
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ


                                                   W.A.No.1550 of 2022
                                                            &
                                                  C.M.P.No.10219 of 2022


                     The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC)
                     Tambaram Assessment Circle
                     Chennai 45.                                           ..   Appellant

                                                            Vs.

                     S.R.Raja Agencies
                     (now known as S.R.Raja Cements)
                     Rep. by its Proprietor
                     No.34, Ramakrishna Street
                     West Tambaram
                     Chennai – 600 045.                                    ..   Respondent

                     Prayer : Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated
                     25.06.2021 passed in W.P.No.20172 of 2020.


                                  For Appellant           : Mr.Haja Nazirudeen
                                                            Additional Advocate General

                     __________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                          W.A.No.1550 of 2022



                                                                   Assisted by
                                                                   Mr.TNC Kaushik
                                                                   Additional Government Pleader

                                     For Respondent             : No appearance

                                                          JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Mohammed Shaffiq,J)

The writ appeal is filed challenging the order of the learned Single

Judge insofar as it finds that levy of additional sales tax in the hands of the

respondent who is an authorised distributor / agent of M/s.Zuari Cement

(Zuari) is unsustainable, in view of the fact that additional sales tax had

been discharged by its principal, viz., M/s. Zuari Cements including on the

turnover of sales of the respondent herein, in terms of Explanation 1 to

Section 2(1)(aa) of Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, 1970. For the

sake of clarity it may be relevant to extract Section 2(1)(aa) of Tamil Nadu

Additional Sales Tax Act, 1970, which relied upon by the learned Judge

while finding that levy of Additional Sales Tax on the respondent herein

cannot be sustained, reads as under:

“Sec. 2(1)(aa) The tax Payable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 1959) (hereafter in this section

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

referred to as the said Act), shall, in the case of a dealer including the principal selling or buying goods through agents taxable turnover [for a year exceeds ten crores of rupees], be increased by an additional tax, calculated at the following rates, namely:

RATE OF TAX

[(i) Where the taxable turnover exceeds ten 1 per cent of the crores of rupees but does not exceed taxable turnover twenty-five crores of rupees.

(i-a) Where the taxable turnover exceeds 1.5 per cent of the twenty-five crores of rupees but does taxable turnover] not exceed fifty crores of rupees.

(ii) Where the taxable turnover exceeds fifty 2 per cent of the crores of rupees but does not exceed one taxable turnover hundred crores of rupees.

(iii) Where the taxable turnover exceeds one 2.5 per cent of the hundred crores of rupees but does not taxable turnover exceed three hundred crores of rupees

(iv) Where the taxable turnover exceeds 3 per cent of the three hundred crores of rupees taxable turnover

Explanation I. - “?Taxable Turnover?” for the purpose of this clause in respect of a principal selling or buying goods [....] through agents shall be the aggregate taxable turnover of all his agents relating to the sale or purchase of the goods of such principal within the State.

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Explanation IV. - 'Taxable turnover' for the purpose of this clause does not include the turnover of resale, taxable under Section 3-H of the said Act.”

2. The learned Additional Advocate General would submit that the

order of the learned Single Judge insofar as it finds that the principal, viz.,

M/s. Zuari Cements (Zuari), had discharged the additional sales tax on the

turn over of sales effected by the respondent, in its capacity as agents of

M/s.Zuari Cements (Zuari) in its entirety may not be factually correct and

requires verification.

3. We find that the above submission is no reason to interfere with

the order of the learned Single Judge. However, if for any reason, the

appellant finds that the additional sales tax on the turn over of sales

effected by the respondent in its capacity as agent of M/s.Zuari

Cements(Zuari) has not been remitted in full, in other words, something is

left to be paid by the principal viz., M/s.Zuari Cements(Zuari) in terms of

Section 2(1)(aa) of the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, it is open to

the revenue to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4. The appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, the interim application also stands disposed of.





                                           (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ)           (MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J.)
                                                            18.02.2025
                     Index :           Yes/No
                     NC :              Yes/No
                     kpl




                     __________



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis





                                   THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                             AND
                                     MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J.


                                                  (kpl)









                                                      18.02.2025




                     __________



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter