Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinayagamoorthy vs The State Rep. By
2025 Latest Caselaw 2550 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2550 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2025

Madras High Court

Vinayagamoorthy vs The State Rep. By on 6 February, 2025

Author: G.K.Ilanthiraiyan
Bench: G.K.Ilanthiraiyan
                                                                            Crl.O.P.No.23152 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 06.02.2025

                                                      CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                               Crl.O.P.No.23152 of 2024
                                               Crl.M.P.No.13145 of 2024

                     Vinayagamoorthy                                           ... Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                     The State rep. by
                     Inspector of Police,
                     Korattur Police Station,
                     Cr. No.779 of 2006                                        ... Respondent

                     Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to
                     call for the records in S.C.No.2 of 2007 on the file of the learned
                     Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, now split and renumbered as
                     S.C.No.162 of 2007 on the file of the learned 2nd Additional District and
                     Sessions Judge, Poonamallee and set aside the charges framed against
                     the petitioner.
                                     For Petitioner   : Mr.G.Sriram

                                     For Respondent   : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
                                                        Additional Public Prosecutor




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page 1 of 6
                                                                              Crl.O.P.No.23152 of 2024

                                                         ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in

S.C.No.162 of 2007 on the file of the learned II Additional District and

Sessions Judge, Poonamallee.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 02.06.2006 at about

10.30 am., when the deceased was inside his office, some accused

persons entered into the office and stabbed him with knives, due to

which he sustained multiple injuries and died. It is alleged that due to

political enmity, the petitioner and others engaged the accused persons to

murder the deceased. On information, the respondent police registered

the FIR in crime No.779 of 2006 and after completion of investigation

filed final report and the same has been taken cognizance in S.C.No.2 of

2007 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur.

Thereafter, the case has been split up as against the petitioner and A13

and re-numbered as S.C.No.162 of 2007 on the file of the learned II

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Poonamallee.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted

that the petitioner is arrayed as A3. The original case in S.C.No.2 of 2007 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

is ended in acquittal, by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in

Crl.A.Nos.639 of 2010 & 496 of 2012 dated 10.01.2023, insofar as the

other accused persons are concerned. He further submitted that the same

witnesses are going to be deposed in the split up case in S.C.No.162 of

2007, as against the petitioner & A13. Hence, he prayed to quash the

proceedings.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

perused the materials placed before this Court.

5. It is relevant to rely upon the judgment reported in 2007 (1)

LW (Crl.) 514 in the case of Tamilmaran Vs. State, in which this Court

held that in the event of acquittal of the other accused disbelieving the

entire prosecution case, no useful purpose would be served for putting

the accused to undergo the ordeal of trial. The said case is in reliance of

the judgment reported in 2000 (1) Crimes 73 in the case of Sunil Kumar

Vs. State. Admittedly, same witnesses are going to be examined.

Therefore, the above decision is squarely applicable to the case on hand.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6. In view of the above, no purpose would be served if the trial

continues. Now the split up case is pending as against the petitioner &

A13. Though A13 did not file any quash petition, it applies to him also.

Therefore, the entire proceedings in S.C.No.162 of 2007 on the file of the

learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Poonamallee, is hereby

quashed as against the petitioner as well as A13.

7. Accordingly, and the Criminal Original Petition stands

allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                                         06.02.2025
                     Index            : Yes/No
                     Neutral citation : Yes/No
                     Speaking/non-speaking order

                     rts




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis






                     To

1. The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Poonamallee.

2. The Inspector of Police, Korattur Police Station.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

rts

06.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter