Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.I.Nabishathul Baheeria vs S.Fathima Ummai [Died
2025 Latest Caselaw 6014 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6014 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2025

Madras High Court

K.I.Nabishathul Baheeria vs S.Fathima Ummai [Died on 16 April, 2025

Author: N. Sathish Kumar
Bench: N. Sathish Kumar
                                                                                             A.S..No.535 of 2015

                                   THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     Date :16.04.2025

                                                           CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                                 A.S.No.535 of 2015 &
                                                CMP.No.19925 of 2016



                   1. K.I.Nabishathul Baheeria
                   2. M.Periya Annamalai                                                     ... Appellants

                                                       Versus

                   1. S.Fathima Ummai [died]
                   2. Annai Christy
                   3. Victoria
                   4. Rebakkal
                   5. Mohamed Qussene
                   6. Sithi Zahira
                   7. Iman Najena
                   8. Hisam Salim
                      [Respondents 5 to 8 are brought on record as LRs
                       of deceased R1 vide Order dated 04.02.2025 made
                       in CMP.No.839 of 2025 in A.S.No.535 of 2015
                       by VSGJ]                                                        ... Respondents

                   PRAYER : This Appeal Suit has been filed under section 96 of Code of Civil
                   Procedure to set aside the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.43 of 2007

                   Page 1 / 6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 12:58:27 pm )
                                                                                        A.S..No.535 of 2015

                   dated 18.03.2010 on the file of the Court of Additional District Judge,
                   Pondicherry at Karaikkal and dismissed the suit by allowing this appeal.


                                   For Appellants       : Mr.N.P.Vijay Kumar

                                   For Respondents : Mr.A.Sathis Kumar – R5 to R8


                                                        JUDGMENT

Challenge has been made to the decree and judgment of the trial Court

decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiffs for specific performance, in the

present Appeal Suit.

2. The suit has been filed by the first respondent against the

respondents 3 to 4 to enforce the sale agreement said to have been executed by

the respondents 3 to 4 which resulted in filing of the suit in O.S.No.43 of 2007

which has been decreed. The appellants have purchased the property from his

previous title holder, who has purchased the property prior to the suit.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 12:58:27 pm )

3. Now a compromise has been reached between the appellants and the

respondents 5 to 8, who are the legal heirs of the first respondent, in whose

favour the decree in O.S.No.43 of 2007 has been passed. A Joint Memo of

Compromise has also been filed before this Court. The respondents 5 to 8 are

present before this Court and identified by their counsel. Similarly, the

appellants' identity has also been established before this Court.

4. The parties have amicably settled the dispute between them. The

appellants have agreed to pay a sum of Rs.31,00,000/- [Rupees thirty one

lakhs to the respondents 5 to 8, out of which a sum of Rs.21,00,000/- [Rupees

twenty one lakhs has been paid by way of Demand Draft No.507202 dated

05.04.2025 drawn on ICICI Bank, Tanjore Branch and remaining

Rs.10,00,000/- [Rupees ten lakhs only] has already been deposited in

LAOP.No.14 of 2017on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, Karaikkal,

to be returned to the respondents 5 to 8 and the respondents 5 to 8 have agreed

to handover all the title documents to the appellants after getting the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 12:58:27 pm )

documents from the trial Court. The Joint Memo of Compromise filed before

this Court is taken on file.

5. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is disposed of in terms of the Joint

Memo of Compromise filed by the parties on 16.11.2024 and the joint

Compromise Memo filed by the parties shall form part of the decree.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. The respondents 5

to 8 are at liberty to file necessary application before the District and Sessions

Judge, Karaikkal and on such application being filed, the learned District and

Sessions Judge shall release the amount lying to the credit of LAOP.No.14 of

2017 to the respondents 5 to 8. If there is any enhancement of the

compensation or any balance amount in the said account, the appellants are

entitled for that amount.

16.04.2025

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order

vrc

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 12:58:27 pm )

To,

1. The District and Sessions Judge, Karaikkal.

2. V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 12:58:27 pm )

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vrc

16.04.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2025 12:58:27 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter