Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Management vs The Presiding Officer
2025 Latest Caselaw 5962 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5962 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2025

Madras High Court

The Management vs The Presiding Officer on 15 April, 2025

Author: R.Subramanian
Bench: R.Subramanian
                                                                                        W.A.No.1153 of 2025
                                                                                        --------------------------

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED : 15.04.2025
                                                         CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                            AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
                                               W.A.No.1153 of 2025
                                                      and
                                              C.M.P.No.8935 of 2025


                The Management,
                The Dharmapuri District Printers
                Service Industrial Co-op Society Ltd.,
                38, P.R.Srinivasa Rao Street,
                Dharmapuri - 636 701.                                                  ... Appellant

                                                              Vs.

                1.The Presiding Officer,
                 Labour Court, Salem.

                2.A.Rajaram                                                            ... Respondents

                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to
                set aside the order dated 23.01.2024 made in W.P.No.20184 of 2010.


                          For Appellants           : Mr.K.Ashok Kumar
                          For Respondents          : Mr.K.V.Shanmuganathan for R2


                                                           *****



                ----------------------
                Page No.: 1 of 7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2025 12:00:06 pm )
                                                                                        W.A.No.1153 of 2025
                                                                                        --------------------------


                                                   JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

Challenge is to the order of the writ Court made in W.P.No.20184 of

2010 dismissing the writ petition, challenge in which was to the award of the

labour Court, Salem made in I.D.No.521 of 2004 directing reinstatement of the

employee with full backwages and continuity of service and all attendant

benefits.

2. The employee, who was working as a Cashier in the appellant Society

was charge sheeted for certain alleged delinquencies viz., passing of payments

which was not duly authorized to the tune of Rs.1,19,000/-. A domestic

enquiry was conducted and the employee was found guilty, resulting in

punishment of dismissal from service being imposed on him.

3. The employee raised an Industrial Dispute. The labour Court found

that the dismissal from service was improper. The labour Court found that the

employee who was a Cashier has acted as per the instructions of the higher

officials viz., President, Secretary, and Accountant of the Society. It was also

found that once the payments were authorized by the higher officials of the

---------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2025 12:00:06 pm )

--------------------------

employee, as a Cashier he had no other option than to pass the payments.

Therefore, he alone cannot be held accountable. On the said finding the labour

Court directed reinstatement.

4. This order was impugned in the writ petition in W.P.No.20184 of

2010. The writ Court agreed with the findings of the labour Court and the writ

Court also recorded the fact that no disciplinary proceedings were launched

against the higher officials on the basis of the statement made by the learned

counsel for the appellant Society. On the above conclusion, the writ Court

dismissed the writ petition upholding the award of the labour Court. Aggrieved

the Society has come up with this appeal.

5. We have heard Mr.K.Ashok Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant Society.

6. Mr.K.Ashok Kumar, learned counsel would vehemently contend that

the fact that the sum of Rs.1,19,000/- was misappropriated stood proved by the

conduct of the employee in paying the said sum to the Society. Therefore, the

punishment imposed has to be sustained. The learned counsel would also

submit that the statement made by him to the effect that no action has been

----------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2025 12:00:06 pm )

--------------------------

taken against the President, Secretary and Accountant is incorrect. He would

draw our attention to the effect that money was paid by all the employees

together. Therefore, the delinquency stood proved.

7. We are unable to accept the submission of the learned counsel for the

appellant. The labour Court has specifically found that all the payments made

by the delinquent employee / 2nd respondent herein were admittedly authorized

by the President, Secretary and Accountant, who are admittedly superiors to the

delinquent employee. Once the superiors have authorized the payments, the

delinquent employee as a Cashier had no other option but to comply with the

claim. He as a Cashier did not have any discretion to refuse payment. It is not

shown even before us as to whether any disciplinary action taken against the

President, Secretary and Accountant, who had authorized the payments.

8. May be the amount has been repaid to the Society, but that by itself

cannot be a ground to conclude that the respondent is guilty of the delinquency

and his dismissal from service is justified. This Court as well as the Hon'ble

Supreme Court have repeatedly held that the jurisdiction to interfere with the

awards of the labour Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of

---------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2025 12:00:06 pm )

--------------------------

the Constitution of India is very limited. Unless it is shown that the award is

per se illegal or it is perverse, the award passed based on the evidence cannot

be disturbed by the writ Court, merely because the writ Court reaches a

different conclusion on the evidence.

9. In the case on hand, the labour Court has appreciated the evidence and

came to a conclusion that the delinquency was not established since all the

payments were authorized by the higher officials. The writ Court has also

confirmed the said finding. Hence, we see no necessity to interfere with the

order of the writ Court. Therefore, the writ appeal fails and it is accordingly

dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.

                                                                                    (R.S.M.,J.)         (G.A.M.,J.)
                                                                                                  15.04.2025
                dsa
                Index                        : No
                Neutral Citation             : No
                Speaking order
                To
                1.The Presiding Officer,
                 Labour Court, Salem.

                2.The Management,

                ----------------------



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                      ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2025 12:00:06 pm )

                                                                                    --------------------------

                  The Dharmapuri District Printers
                  Service Industrial Co-op Society Ltd.,

38, P.R.Srinivasa Rao Street, Dharmapuri - 636 701.

---------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2025 12:00:06 pm )

--------------------------

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

dsa

15.04.2025

----------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2025 12:00:06 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter