Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anju Kumar vs Swathy
2024 Latest Caselaw 17366 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17366 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2024

Madras High Court

Anju Kumar vs Swathy on 3 September, 2024

                                                                                C.R.P. (PD) No.3480 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   Dated : 03.09.2024

                                                       CORAM

                             THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                            C.R.P. (PD) No.3480 of 2024
                                        and C.M.P.Nos.18839 & 18840 of 2024

            1.Anju Kumar
            2.Sampath Kumar
            3.Vasantha
            4.Priyanka Mohan Kumar                                                    ... Petitioners
                                                          Vs.
            Swathy                                                                    ... Respondent


            PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
            India, to call for the entire records pertaining to D.V.A.No.77 of 2024 on the file of
            the Special Court to try cases filed under Domestic Violence Act, Coimbatore.


                      For the Petitioners      :       Mr.Mahesh Kumar .S

                                                       ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition seeks to quash the D.V.A.No.77 of 2024 on the

file of the Special Court to try cases filed under Domestic Violence Act, Coimbatore.

2. The relationship between the parties is not in dispute. The 1st petitioner is

the husband of the respondent. The petitioners 2 and 3 are his parents. The 4 th https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

petitioner is his sister. The 1st petitioner and the respondent entered into matrimony

on 06.04.2022. Thereafter, the parties set up their matrimonial home at Hosur.

Alleging that she had undergone domestic violence, she filed a petition in

D.V.A.No.77 of 2024. She had invoked the provisions of Sections 18, 20, 22 and 23

of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

3. According to her, there has been demand of dowry and in addition the

husband as well as the other petitioners used to regularly indulge in verbally abusing

her by using swear words. She would state that the sister-in-law had egged her

husband to indulge in such abuse.

4. Mr.Mahesh Kumar would state that all these complaints are false. He would

state that this is a case which cries out to quash the domestic violence proceedings by

exercising the power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

5. The position of law with respect of quashing of domestic violence case has

been laid down by the Supreme Court in Inderjit Singh Grewal Vs. State of Punjab

and Ors., (2012 Crl L.J 309). In the said Judgment, the Supreme Court had directed

the Courts exercising the powers to quash a complaint has to go through the

averments made therein and if specific allegations are found against the parties, then

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

it directed that the party should be referred for trial.

6. A perusal of the complaint in the present case in particular paragraph No.2

onwards makes out allegations which would attract Section 3 of the Protection of

Women from Domestic Violence Act. Therefore, applying the Judgment as aforesaid

to the facts of the present case, I am not in a position to come to the rescue of

Mr.Mahesh Kumar's client.

7. At this stage, Mr.Mahesh Kumar would submit that the 1st Civil Revision

Petitioner has suffered both physically and emotionally on account of the fact that his

wife has moved away from him along with a year old daughter. He would submit that

in case the matter is referred to mediation, there is a dintict possibility that the matter

would be settled. He would therefore, wanted the matter to be referred to the

mediation centre in Chennai.

8. I have considered the submission and I have to take note of the fact that the

petitioners are the resident of Zuzuvadi, Hosur and the respondent-wife is a resident

of Kuniamuthur in Coimbatore. Asking both the parties to come to Chennai might

not be conducive as the wife would have to travel with a year old female child from

Coimbatore to Chennai. This I feel might not be proper.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

9. Hence, I would direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, to send the parties for

mediation to the District Mediation Centre at Coimbatore. The appearance of the

petitioners 2 to 4 are dispensed with. They shall appear as and when their presence is

so directed by the Court below.

10. With the above directions, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed.

No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

03.09.2024

Jer

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral citation : Yes / No To The Special Court to try cases filed under Domestic Violence Act Coimbatore.

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J., https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Jer

and C.M.P.Nos.18839 & 18840 of 2024

03.09.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter