Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20862 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2024
T.C.A.No.297 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Tax Case Appeal No.297 of 2022
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I
Chennai. .... Appellant
Vs.
Smt.Amudha Sukumar .... Respondent
-----
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench,
Chennai, dated 12.04.2022 made in I.T.A.No.883 of 2016.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy
-----
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question
the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Chennai by raising the following substantial questions of law:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
"(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the excess amount of Rs.7 Crores received by the Assessee from KGS Developers Ltd as compensation was liable to be taxed as long term capital gains in the hands of the Assessee even though there was no transfer of any capital assets?
(ii) Is not reasoning and finding of the Tribunal bad since the excess amount of Rs.7 Crores earned by the Assessee was due to the forfeiture clause in the agreement which has resulted in earning income from other sources only and being a revenue receipt has to be assessed under the said head?
2. It is brought to our notice by the learned Standing Counsel for the
appellant Revenue that in the instant case, as per the CBDT's Circular No.9 of
2024 dated 17.09.2024 the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit
imposed and therefore, the appeal can be disposed of, keeping the substantial
questions of law raised in this appeal open for adjudication at a later point of
time.
3. It is further submitted by the learned Standing Counsel that to an e-
mail communication dated 04.10.2024 requesting instructions as to whether
this case is covered under low tax effect, the reply given by the Revenue is in
the affirmative. Therefore, based on such instructions from the Revenue, the
learned Standing Counsel submits that this appeal can be disposed of.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Standing
Counsel for the appellant Revenue, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low
tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at
appropriate stage. No costs.
(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.)
19.10.2024
NCS : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
KST
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
'B' Bench, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
AND
C.SARAVANAN, J.
KST
19.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!