Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R. Chellapandian vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2024 Latest Caselaw 20821 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20821 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2024

Madras High Court

R. Chellapandian vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 19 October, 2024

Author: R.Vijayakumar

Bench: R.Vijayakumar

                                                                         W.P.(MD).No.1359 of 2024


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 19.10.2024

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                              W.P(MD)No.1359 of 2024
                                                       and
                                             W.M.P(MD) No.1408 of 2024

                     R. Chellapandian                                        ... Petitioner
                                                            Vs.

                     1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                        Represented by its Secretary,
                        Department of Education,
                        St.George Fort, Chennai.

                     2. The Director of School Education,
                        College Road,
                        Chennai – 9.

                     3. The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Tirunelveli,
                        Tirunelveli District.

                     4. The District Educational Officer,
                        Cheranmahadevi,
                        Tirunelveli District.

                     5. The Correspondent,
                        Senaithalaivar Higher Secondary School,
                        Vickirasingapuram,
                        Ambasamuthiram,
                        Tirunelveli.

                     1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 W.P.(MD).No.1359 of 2024


                     6. The Accountant General,
                        Office of Accountant General,
                        361, Annasalai, Chennai.                                     ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
                     records relating to the impugned order of the sixth respondent in No.P25/
                     12524083/2/PPO.No.R2524083, dated 17.08.2022 and consequently direct
                     the respondent to revise the pension pay by calculating the pension for 27
                     years 11 months 19 days, instead of 19 years 2 months 29 days and disburse
                     arrears and all other benefits within stipulated period as fixed by this Court.

                                              For Petitioner    : Mr.S.Chellapandian

                                              For R1 to R4      : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar
                                                                  Additional Government Pleader
                                              For R5            : No appearance

                                              For R6            : Mr.P.Gunasekaran
                                                                  Standing Counsel

                                                               ORDER

The instant Writ Petition has been filed by a retired Secondary Grade

Teacher, challenging the order passed by the sixth respondent, wherein the

service of the writ petitioner before successfully completing Child

Psychology Course was not taken into consideration for the purposes of

calculating pension.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The petitioner after having acquired qualification to be appointed as

B.T.Assistant Teacher, without Certificate of the said Child Psychology

Course was appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher. The petitioner has

completed the Certificate Course in Child Psychology only on 31.05.2003.

Based upon G.O.(Ms) No.155, School Education Department, dated

03.10.2002, the sixth respondent had excluded the services of the petitioner

prior to the passing of the Child Psychology Course for the purposes of

calculating pension. This order is under challenge in the present writ petition.

3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner,

G.O.(Ms) No.155, School Education Department, dated 03.10.2002 was put

to challenge before this Court and this Court, by an order, dated 02.04.2004

has upheld the said Government Order, but, directed the authorities to count

the past services for the purposes of pension and therefore, the sixth

respondent was not right in excluding the said period.

4. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for

the respondents 1 to 4 as well as the learned counsel appearing for the sixth

respondent had contended that in view of Clause 8 of G.O(Ms) No.155,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

School Education Department, dated 03.10.2002, the period during which the

petitioner is not having the qualification of Child Psychology Certificate,

cannot be considered for any purposes including pension.

5. I have carefully considered the submissions made by the learned

counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. In the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of our High Court in

W.A.No.249 of 2002, dated 02.04.2004 (The State of Tamil Nadu,

Represented by its Secretary, Education Department Vs. Pallivasal Primary

School, Represented by its Correspondent, Mudukulathur), in Paragraph

No.8, it is held as follows:

“...... 8. Their right to be regarded as persons eligible for confirmation/approval can be said to arise only after they acquired, after their training, a minimum prescribed qualification. The Government here has shown great concession to them by allowing them to retain their position even without obtaining the requisite diploma or certificate in child psychology by giving to them training in child psychology. We seek nothing wrong in the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Government directing that their approval/confirmation can only be on and after the date they complete the training. Their past service however shall count for pension.”

7. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of our High

Court, it is clear that though the period during which the petitioner is not

possessing the Child Psychology Certificate cannot be considered for any

purpose, the same could be granted for the purposes of pension.

8. In such circumstances, the order of the sixth respondent excluding

the said period for the purposes of calculating pension is not legally

sustainable and therefore, the order impugned in the writ petition is set aside

and the sixth respondent is directed to calculate the period between

11.03.1996 and 31.05.1993 as pensionable service and calculate the pension

and disburse the benefits within a period of twelve weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

9. With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed to

the extent as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently

connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.




                                                                                               19.10.2024
                     NCC      : Yes/No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     ebsi


                     To

                     1. The Secretary,
                        Department of Education,
                        St.George Fort, Chennai.

                     2. The Director of School Education,
                        College Road,
                        Chennai – 9.

                     3. The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Tirunelveli,
                        Tirunelveli District.

                     4. The District Educational Officer,
                        Cheranmahadevi,
                        Tirunelveli District.



                     5. The Correspondent,

Senaithalaivar Higher Secondary School,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Vickirasingapuram, Ambasamuthiram, Tirunelveli.

6. The Accountant General, Office of Accountant General, 361, Annasalai, Chennai.

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ebsi

19.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter