Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

U. Nandakumar vs K. Balaji
2024 Latest Caselaw 20679 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20679 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024

Madras High Court

U. Nandakumar vs K. Balaji on 23 October, 2024

Author: R.Hemalatha

Bench: R. Hemalatha

                                                                                      CMA.No.2749 of 2024


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED: 23.10.2024

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

                                                    C.M.A.No.2749 of 2024

                     U. Nandakumar                                          .... Appellant

                                                              vs.
                     1. K. Balaji

                     2. M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited
                        Sillingi Building, 4th Floor,
                        No.134, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.       ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Award dated 20.07.2023                      in
                     M.C.O.P.5108/2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                     Special Sub Court No.1, Small Causes Court, Chennai.


                                    For Appellant       : Mr. K. Balaji
                                    R1                  : No appearance
                                    For R2              : Mr. K. Swaminathan




                     1/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   CMA.No.2749 of 2024




                                                   JUDGMENT

The appellant is the claimant in M.C.O.P.5108/2018 on the file

of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court No.1, Small

Causes Court, Chennai, and he filed the claim petition under Section 166

of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 3 of M.A.C.T Rules, seeking

compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a road

accident that occurred on 24.02.2018.

2. The case of the claimant is that on 24.02.2018, he was riding

his motorcycle bearing Registration Number TN 01 S 8076 on

Mambakkam Main Road, Kovilanchery, Chennai and at about 9.00 hours,

a speeding lorry bearing Registration Number TN-25-AV-2316,

belonging to the first respondent, hit his two wheeler as a result of which

he fell down and sustained injuries all over his body. He was immediately

rushed to a hospital.

2.1. According to the claimant, the rash and negligent driving

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

of the driver of the lorry bearing Registration Number TN-25-AV-2316

was the cause of the accident and that since the said lorry was insured

with the second respondent, the United India Insurance Company

Limited, Chennai, the owner and the insurer are jointly and severally

liable to pay compensation to him.

3. In the Tribunal the owner of the lorry remained absent and

was set ex parte. The second respondent insurance company resisted the

claim petition on all the grounds available to the insurer under Section

170 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

4. The Tribunal, after analysing the evidence on record,

fastened negligence on the part of the driver of the lorry bearing

Registration Number TN-25-AV-2316 and directed the second respondent

Insurance company to pay compensation of Rs.2,21,000/- to the claimant

together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of the

petition till the date of realisation. The Tribunal further held that the

liability of the owner of the lorry and the insurer is joint and several.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. Aggrieved over the quantum of compensation awarded by the

Tribunal, the claimant has filed the present appeal under Section 173 of

the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

6. Heard Mr.K. Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant and Mr.K. Swaminathan, learned counsel appearing for the

second respondent/Insurance Company.

7. Mr.K. Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the appellant

contended that the Award passed by the Tribunal is not commensurate

with the injuries sustained by the claimant. He, therefore, prayed for

enhancement of compensation.

8. Per contra, Mr.K. Swaminathan, learned counsel appearing

for the second respondent/Insurance Company contended that the

Tribunal, after analysing the evidence on record, had awarded just

compensation and therefore the same need not be disturbed in the present

appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

9. A perusal of the records shows that the claimant sustained

fracture on his right shoulder. The Medical Board attached to

Government Royapettah Hospital, Chennai, assessed the partial

permanent disability of the claimant as 30%. Since there is no functional

disability, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- towards partial

permanent disability by fixing a sum of Rs.5,000/- per percentage of

disability. The claimant was aged 23 years on the date of accident.

Considering the age of the claimant and the year of accident, a sum of

Rs.7,000/- per percentage of disability is awarded. Hence, a sum of

Rs.2,10,000/- is awarded towards partial permanent disability.

9.1. According to the claimant he was working as an

Accountant in a private concern earning a sum of Rs.12,000/- per month.

In the absence of satisfactory income proof, the Tribunal fixed the

notional monthly income of the claimant as Rs.11,000/- and awarded a

sum of Rs.22,000/- (11,000x2) towards loss of income. The accident took

place in the year 2018 and in the circumstances, fixing the notional

monthly income of the claimant as Rs.12,000/- would meet the ends of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

justice. On account of the accident, the claimant would have been out of

action atleast for three months and therefore, a sum of Rs.36,000/-

(12,000x3) is awarded towards loss of income.

9.2. The following tabular column would show the amount

awarded by the Tribunal and the amount awarded by this Court under

various heads.

                           S.No.       Description            Amount            Amount
                                                            awarded by    awarded by this
                                                         Tribunal (Rs.)      Court (Rs.)

                         1.        Partial permanent         1,50,000/-        2,10,000/-
                                   disability                (30x5000)         (30x7000)
                         2.        Pain and sufferings         25,000/-          50,000/-
                         3.        Transportation               4,000/-           5,000/-
                         4.        Extra nourishment           10,000/-          10,000/-
                         5.        Loss of earnings           22,000/-          36,000/-
                                                            (11,000x2)        (12,000x3)
                         6.        Loss of amenities           10,000/-          10,000/-
                                   Total                     2,21,000/-        3,21,000/-



9.3. Thus, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is

enhanced to Rs.3,21,000/- that would carry interest at the rate of 7.5%

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

per annum.

10. In the result,

i. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.

ii. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to

Rs.3,21,000/-.

iii. The appellant / claimant is directed to pay court fee for the

enhanced compensation amount, if any, and the Registry is directed

to draft the decree only after receipt of Court fee.

iv. The second Respondent, the United India Insurance Company

Limited, Chennai, is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation

amount of Rs.3,21,000 /- (less the amount already deposited)

together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of

claim petition till the date of deposit to the credit of

M.C.O.P.5108/2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Special Sub Court No.1, Small Causes Court, Chennai,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this order/uploading of this order.

v. On such deposit being made, the appellant/claimant is at liberty to

withdraw the same, after following due process of law.

23.10.2024

Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order bga To

1. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court No.1, Small Causes Court, Chennai

2. M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited Sillingi Building, 4th Floor, No.134, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.HEMALATHA, J.

bga

23.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter