Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20315 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024
C.R.P.No.1357 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
C.R.P.No.1357 of 2011
Varadhan .... Petitioner
vs
1.G.Mani (died)
2.G.Krishnamurthy
3.G.Venkatesan
4.G.Anbzhagi
5.G.Shanthi
6.G.Vijaya
7.M.Saravana
8.M.Bharath
9.P.Somya
(Respondents 7 to 9 are brought on record as
LRs of the deceased 1st respondent vide Court
order dated 08.03.2024 made in CMP No.
4304 of 2024 in CRP No.1357 of 2011) .... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
against fair and decreetal order dated 31.01.2011 passed in I.A.No.38 of 2009 in
A.S.No.99 of 2008 on the file of Principal District Court, Tiruvallur.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajkumar
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.No.1357 of 2011
For Mr.R.Bharath Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijaya Raghavan
For R.2 to R.6
Ms P.Radhika
For R.7 to R.9
R.1 – died
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal
order dated 31.01.2011 passed in I.A.No.38 of 2009 in A.S.No.99 of 2008 on the
file of Principal District Court, Tiruvallur.
2. The respondent in A.S.No.99 of 2008 on the file of Principal District
Court, Tiruvallur has filed the present revision. During the pendency of the
appeal, the respondents herein, who are the appellants in A.S.No.99 of 2008 have
filed an application in I.A.No.38 of 2009 under Order 41 Rule 27 of Code of Civil
Procedure, seeking for filing of additional evidence. The lower appellate Court
has allowed the application by impugned order dated 31.01.2011. Challenging the
same, the present revision has been filed by the petitioner, who is the respondent
in A.S.No.99 of 2008.
3. It is now submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that no
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
stay was granted by this Court and the lower appellate Court, after marking
Exs.B.1 to B.17, as additional documents, allowed A.S.No.99 of 2008 on
31.01.2011 and as against the judgment passed in A.S.No.99 of 2008 the revision
petitioner herein has filed Second Appeals in S.A.Nos.401 and 402 of 2011 and
the same are pending before this Court and therefore submits that the Civil
Revision Petition may be closed as they have become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that liberty may be
granted to the petitioner to canvas his submissions before this Court in
S.A.Nos.401 and 402 of 2011.
5. In view of the above, CRP No.1357 of 2011 is closed with a liberty to
the revision petitioner to make his submissions in S.A.Nos.401 and 402 of 2011.
No costs.
25.10.2024 sr Index:yes/no website:yes/no A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J,.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
sr
To
The Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
25.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!