Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19890 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
Rev.Aplc(MD)No.132 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
REVIEW APPLICATION(MD)No.132 of 2024
in W.P(MD)No.23304 of 2023
and W.M.P(MD)Nos.13063 & 13064 of 2024
M.Ravikumar ... Petitioner/Review Petitioner
Vs.
1.S.Ravichandran
2.The Commissioner,
Aruppukkottai Municipality,
Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Tahsildar,
Aruppukkottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
4.The Surveyor,
Aruppukkottai Taluk,
Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents/Respondents
Prayer:- Review Application filed under Order XLVII, Rules 1 & 2 of the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 to review the order, dated 08.02.2024 made in
W.P(MD)No.23304 of 2023 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul
For R – 1 : Mr.S.Parthasarathy
For R – 2 : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar
For RR 3 & 4 : Mr.R.Ragavendran
Government Advocate
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
Rev.Aplc(MD)No.132 of 2024
ORDER
The review application has been filed by the third party to
review the order, dated 08.02.2024 passed by this Court in
W.P(MD)No.23304 of 2023.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned
Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 3 & 4 has
produced the proceedings of the third respondent, dated 12.09.2024,
wherein it is stated as follows:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3.According to the learned Government Advocate appearing for
the respondents 3 and 4, 20 cents of land which falls in Survey No.7/2
has not been mentioned in the sale deed, dated 23.03.2022 executed
by the parties, namely Divya, Suryapandian and Shanthi, who are the
sisters and brother of the review petitioner.
4.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5.The buyer beware concept to be taken into account and if at
all the original writ petitioner/first respondent is aggrieved, he has to
approach the parties, who are the vendors to rectify the said sale deed
by including 20 cents in Survey No.7/2. Since Survey No.7/2 is missing,
it has to be rectified. On receiving the rectification deed, the authorities
will include the said Aruppukkottai Kaikani Motha Viyabarigal Sangam's
name in the said patta.
6.In view of the above, the Review Application is closed. It is
left open to the writ petitioner/first respondent to approach the vendors
and proceed further in the manner known to law. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
22.10.2024
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
ps
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
ps
Judgment made in
REVIEW APPLICATION(MD)No.132 of 2024
and W.M.P(MD)Nos.13063 & 13064 of 2024
22.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!