Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19787 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2024
T.C.A.No.885 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Tax Case Appeal No.885 of 2015
and M.P.No.1 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Company Circle III, Chennai. .... Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Tamil Nadu Small Industries
Corporation Ltd., Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial
Estate, Guindy, Chennai-32. .... Respondent
-----
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench Chennai,
dated 19.12.2014 made in I.T.A.No.1567/Mds/2014.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan, Senior Counsel
for M/s.S.Ramesh Kumar
1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.885 of 2015
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question
the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Chennai by raising the following substantial questions of law:
1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that provision for leave salary is allowable expenditure even though it is not actually paid before the due date of filing the return of income which is against the Section 43B(f)?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in ignoring that the Section 43B(f) was only introduced in the Finance Act 2001 which came into effect from 01.04.2022?
2. It is brought to our notice by the learned Standing Counsel for the
appellant Revenue that in the instant case, as per the CBDT's Circular No.9 of
2024 dated 17.09.2024 the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit
imposed and therefore, the appeal can be disposed of, keeping the substantial
questions of law raised in this appeal open for adjudication at a later point of
2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
time.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Standing
Counsel for the appellant Revenue, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low
tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at
appropriate stage. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition
is closed.
(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.)
21.10.2024
KST
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'C' Bench, Chennai.
3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
AND C.SARAVANAN, J.
KST
21.10.2024
4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!