Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Jaganathan vs /
2024 Latest Caselaw 19747 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19747 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2024

Madras High Court

S.Jaganathan vs / on 21 October, 2024

Author: S.S.Sundar

Bench: S.S.Sundar

                                                                             W.A. No.2548 of 2022


                                   THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED: 21.10.2024
                                                        CORAM:
                                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
                                                   AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

                                                  W.A.No.2548 of 2022
                                                          and
                                                 C.M.P.No.20049 of 2022

                     1. S.Jaganathan

                     2. K.Kappal Munusamy                                 .. Appellants


                                                         /versus/

                     1. The State of Tamil Nadu,
                        Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                        Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
                        Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

                     2. The Special Tahsildar,
                        Adi Dravidar Welfare,
                        Salem.

                     3. The Tahsildar,
                        Valapadi Taluk,
                        Valapadi, Salem District.

                     4. M.Muthu                                           .. Respondents




                     1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                           W.A. No.2548 of 2022


                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set
                     aside the order dated 24.06.2022 passed in the Writ Petition in
                     W.P.No.29564 of 2016.
                                  For the Appellants        :       Mr.K.Thanigavel
                                                                    for Mr.S.Doraisamy

                                  For the Respondents       :       Mr.A.Selvendran
                                                                    Special Government Pleader,
                                                                                     for RR 1 to 3

                                                                    No appearance for R4

                                                                ********

                                                         JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR,J.)

The writ appeal is filed against the order dated 24.06.2022 made in

W.P.No.29564 of 2016, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants to

issue a writ of declaration.

2. The appellants/ petitioners, who are the owners of the property filed

the writ petition only on the ground that the acquisition proceedings are

deemed to have been lapsed on account of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair

Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquiition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act, 2013 i.e., the Tamil Nadu Act 30 of 2013.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition following the

judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority

Vs. Manoharlal and others reported in AIR 2020 SC 1496 holding that the

fact that the award has been passed and compensation money payable to the

acquired lands had been deposited in Court is not in dispute.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Special

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.

5. The fact that the award has been passed and compensation money

payable for the acquired lands had been deposited in Court is not disputed

by the appellants. Even in the dates and events furnished by the appellants

the fact that the award was passed on 16.03.1992 and that award amount

was deposited at Sub-Court, Salem on 10.04.1992 is admitted.

6. It is also to be noted that the 1 st appellant challenged the acquisition

proceedings before this Court in a writ petition earlier in W.P.No.16331 of

1991 and the same was also dismissed on 30.06.1999. It was thereafter the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1st appellant sold the property in favour of the 2 nd appellant by a document

dated 20.08.1999.

7. The 2nd appellant filed a writ petition in W.P.No.23034 of 2012 for

issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to dispossess

the 2nd appellant without due process of law. This Court disposed of the

writ petition by order dated 15.09.2015 directing the 2nd respondent in the

writ petition to pass appropriate orders. Thereafter, the 2nd respondent in the

said writ petition passed the order on 05.08.2016 stating that the lands have

been acquired for providing house sites to Arunthathiyar. However, it is

stated that the possession of the land had not been handed over to the land

Acquisition officer. It is in this circumstance, the 2nd respondent, appears to

have written a letter to the 1st appellant directing the 1st appellant to deliver

possession of the land on or before 24.06.2010 to the 2nd respondent.

8. Taking advantage of the letter that was sent by the Tahsildar dated

05.08.2016, the appellants have contended that possession has not been

taken pursuant to the acquisition proceedings which was completed in the

year 1992.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

9. In this case, the acquisition proceedings was challenged by the 1 st

appellant and it is only after the dismissal of the writ petition by order dated

30.06.1999, the 1st appellant sold the property in favour of the 2nd appellant.

Therefore, the 2nd appellant is a person who will get no right since the sale in

favour of the 2nd appellant itself is null and void. The 2nd appellant, after

several years filed the writ petition for issuing a direction to the respondents

not to dis-possess the 2nd appellant without due process of law. It is only

because of the pendency of previous writ petition, there was delay in taking

possession. There is no merit in this writ petition in view of the judgment in

Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and others reported in

AIR 2020 SC 1496, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as follows:-

“The word ‘or’ used in Section 24(2) between possession and compensation has to be read as ‘nor’ or as ‘and’. The deemed lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act takes place where due to inaction of authorities for five years or more prior to commencement of the said Act, the possession of land has not been taken nor compensation has been paid. In other words, in case possession has been taken, compensation

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

has not been paid then there is no lapse. Similarly, if compensation has been paid, possession has not been taken then there is no lapse.”

10. In view of the same, the appellants are not entitled to any relief

under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in

Land Acquiition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. We do not see

any merit in this writ appeal, accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No

costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                    (S.S.S.R., J.)      (A.D.M.C., J.)
                                                                                 21.10.2024
                     dsa
                     Index                    : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation         : Yes/No







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                     To
                     1. The Secretary to Government,
                        State of Tamil Nadu,

Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Salem.

3. The Tahsildar, Valapadi Taluk, Valapadi, Salem District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.S.SUNDAR, J.

and A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

dsa

21.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter