Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.M.Deepika vs The Chief Educational Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 19530 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19530 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2024

Madras High Court

R.M.Deepika vs The Chief Educational Officer on 18 October, 2024

Author: R.Vijayakumar

Bench: R.Vijayakumar

                                                                          W.P.(MD).No.22824 of 2024


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED : 18.10.2024

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                              W.P(MD)No.22824 of 2024
                                                       and
                                             W.M.P(MD) No.19348 of 2024

                     R.M.Deepika
                     B.T.Assistant (English)
                     Sri Onnuramaswamy Middle School,
                     Thevaram,
                     Theni District.                                           ... Petitioner
                                                           Vs.

                     1. The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Office of the Chief Educational Office,
                        Theni, Theni District.

                     2. The District Educational Officer,
                            (Elementary)
                        Office of the District Educational Office,
                        Theni, Theni District.

                     3. The Block Educational Officer,
                        Office of the Block Educational Office,
                        Uthamapalayam,
                        Theni District.

                     4. The President,
                        Sri Onnuramaswamy Middle School,
                        Thevaram, Theni District.                           ... Respondents



                     1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 W.P.(MD).No.22824 of 2024


                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
                     records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his
                     proceedings in Na.Ka.No.139/M3/2022, dated 12.09.2024 and quash the
                     same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to approve
                     the appointment of petitioner as B.T.Assistant (English) w.e.f., 06.06.2019
                     without reference to pass in Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) and pay arrears of
                     salary with all consequential benefits arising thereon within the period that
                     may be stipulated by this Court.

                                              For Petitioner    : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar
                                                                  for M/s.Ajmal Associates

                                              For R1 to R3      : Mr.J.Ashok
                                                                  Additional Government Pleader


                                                               ORDER

The instant Writ Petition has been filed by a B.T.Assistant (English),

challenging the order passed by the second respondent herein on 12.09.2024

wherein the request of the School Management for approval of her

appointment has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner has not passed

TET Examination.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. A perusal of the records indicates that the petitioner was appointed as

B.T.Assistant (English) in the fourth respondent School on 06.06.2019. The

fourth respondent School is admittedly a Linguistic Minority Institution. The

Management has forwarded the proposals for approval of the appointment of

the writ petitioner. Under the impugned order, dated 12.09.2024 the second

respondent has rejected the same on the ground that the petitioner has not

passed TET examination. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has

been filed.

3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner,

since the fourth respondent School is a Linguistic Minority Institution,

passing of TET Examination is not mandatory, in view of the judgment of the

Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents 1 to 3 relying upon the counter had contended that unless the

petitioner clears the TET examination, she would not be eligible to be

appointed in the fourth respondent School which is a Minority Institution.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5. The Hon'ble Division Bench of our High Court in W.A.No.313 of

2022 and batch case, dated 02.06.2023, in para No.71.1 held as follows:

“71.1. A perusal of the orders impugned in the writ petitions leading to these writ appeals would indicate that the fact that the teachers, in respect of whom approval of appointment was sought for by the school, did not possess TET pass eligibility was not a ground for refusal for grant of appointment approval, nor was it an issued raised before the Learned Single Judge at the time of disposal of the writ petitions. Only in the writ appeals, the State Government has raised an additional ground that the teachers whose appointment approval was sought for, did not possess TET. Notwithstanding the same, it is hereby clarified that by virtue of the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust & Ors. v. Union of India, [(2014) 8 SCC 1], wherein it was held that the RTE Act, 2009 insofar as it applies to minority schools, aided or unaided, covered under Article 30(1) is ultravires the Constitution, meaning thereby that the 2009 Act will not apply to minority schools, the eligibility of TET pass as required for appointment of teachers in non-

minority schools, will not apply to minority schools. In other words, the approval of appointment of teachers in minority schools, both aided and unaided, cannot be refused or rejected on the ground that they do not possess a pass in TET. Further this specific issue is also pending consideration before the Supreme Court and the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust, cited supra, holds the field as on today. For these reasons, the order of the Learned

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Judge in the writ petitions is affirmed and the above four writ appeals are dismissed.”

6. In view of the judgment of Hon'ble Division Bench, TET is not

mandatory for being appointed as a teacher in an aided minority institution.

Therefore, the order impugned in the writ petition is set aside and the matter

is remitted back to the file of the second respondent herein. The second

respondent is directed to approve the appointment of the writ petitioner with

effect from 06.06.2019 with all attendant benefits. The said exercise shall be

completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order.

7. With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed to

the extent as state above. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently

connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.




                                                                                                     18.10.2024
                     NCC      : Yes/No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     ebsi



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                     To

                     1. The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Office of the Chief Educational Office,
                        Theni, Theni District.

                     2. The District Educational Officer,
                            (Elementary)

Office of the District Educational Office, Theni, Theni District.

3. The Block Educational Officer, Office of the Block Educational Office, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.

4. The President, Sri Onnuramaswamy Middle School, Thevaram, Theni District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

ebsi

18.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter