Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Varusai Rowther Chatram And vs /
2024 Latest Caselaw 5133 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5133 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2024

Madras High Court

Varusai Rowther Chatram And vs / on 5 March, 2024

Author: Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup

Bench: Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup

                                                                           WP(MD) No.2366 of 2024

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 05.03.2024

                                                     CORAM:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

                                              W.P.(MD) No.2366 of 2024

                Varusai Rowther Chatram and
                Thaneer Pandal Waqf,
                Represented by its Muthawalli,
                Mohamed Rafeek                                           ... Petitioner

                                                        /vs./
                1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board,
                  Represented by its Chief Executive Officer,
                  No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street,
                  Vallal Seethakathi Nagar,
                  Chennai – 600 001.

                2.The District Revenue Officer and
                  Additional District Magistrate,
                  Tiruchirappalli.

                3.The Superintendent of Police,
                  Office of the Superintendent of Police,
                  Trichy District – 620 020.

                4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                  Tiruchirappalli District.

                5.The Tahsildar,
                  Thiruvembur Taluk,
                  Tiruchirappalli District.



                1/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                WP(MD) No.2366 of 2024




                6.The Inspector of Police,
                  Thriuvembur Police Station,
                  Trichy District.

                7.The Superintendent of Waqf,
                  Trichy Zone,
                  Trichy District.

                8.P.Kalimuthu                                                 ... Respondents

                PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 3 and 6 to provide
                adequate police protection for putting up fencing in the waqf property bearing
                S.F.No. 198, New S.No. 198/1 situated at Papakurichi Village, Trichy District,
                measuring an extent of 31.35 acres belongs to Varusai Rowther Chatram and
                Thaneer Pandal Waqf by considering the petitioner's representation dated
                07.11.2023.


                                  For Petitioner    : Ms.A.Ajimath Begum

                                  For R-2 to R-6    : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
                                                      Additional Public Prosecutor

                                  For R-1 and R-7   : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed
                                                      Standing Counsel

                                  For R-8           : Mr.S.Muthukrishnan




                2/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  WP(MD) No.2366 of 2024




                                                           ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing on 06.02.2024, the learned Counsel

for the Petitioner put forth her submissions and this Court passed the following

order:

“The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is Varusai Rowther Chatram and Thaneer Pandal Waqf. The Petitioner had filed this Writ Petition seeking direction against the Respondents 3 and 6 to give protection for putting up fence in the Waqf property. The property of the Waqf had been encroached by third parties, for which there was civil dispute between them before the Sub Court. The Sub Court had passed a decree against the Petitioner herein. Subsequently, an appeal was filed before this Court, wherein the appeal was decreed in favour of the Waqf, the Petitioner herein, setting aside the judgment of the learned Sub Judge. Also, the parties did not obey the judgment and decree. Therefore, the Petitioner herein was forced to move the Revenue Authorities seeking patta. As per the enquiry conducted by the Authorities under the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act, after holding enquiry, patta was granted in favour of the Petitioner. The copy of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the same had been enclosed in the typed set of papers. Subsequently, the Respondents herein moved W.P.(MD) No. 24922 of 2023 challenging the proceedings in granting patta in favour of the Petitioner. The Writ Petition was dismissed by order dated 06.11.2023, against which the Writ Petitioner had not filed any appeal till date. Therefore, the Petitioner Wakf seeks police protection for securing the land belonging to Wakf by fencing the properties. She would further submit that the Respondents, who are the encroachers, are aware of the earlier proceedings. Still they are creating trouble by not permitting the Petitioner to fence the property and secure the property. Therefore, the Petitioner was forced to file this Writ Petition.

2.Issue notice to the 8th Respondent returnable by 16.02.2024. Private notice is also permitted. Registry is directed to list this case on 16.02.2024 at top of the list under the caption 'part heard'.”

2. The learned Counsel for the eighth Respondent / private Respondent is

also present before this Court. He seeks time to respond to the submission of

the learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. Earlier the eighth Respondent had filed Writ Petition in W.P.(MD).No.

24922 of 2023 and the learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated

06.11.2023 had dismissed the Writ Petition with an observation “The Petitioner

lacks the locus standi to even challenge the same. If the Petitioner has any

claim against the seventh Respondent, it is for him to work out his rights before

the jurisdictional civil court. The writ court cannot grant any relief. In any

event, the impugned order cannot be challenged by the Petitioner”.

4. The earlier Writ Petition filed by the eighth Respondent challenging

the proceedings in granting of patta in favour of the seventh Respondent/

Petitioner herein, was already dismissed. Hence, the patta which was granted

by the revenue officials in favour of the Petitioner herein /Varusai Rowther

Chatram and Thaneer Pandal Waqf, after conducting survey and measuring the

properties, cannot be objected by the eighth Respondent.

5. The learned Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 7 adopt the version of

the Petitioner in this Writ Petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

6. In the light of the above, the Respondent Police is directed to extend

Police protection for the Wakf authority to fence their property.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.





                                                                                05.03.2024
                NCC      : Yes / No
                Index : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No
                Nsr

                TO:

                1.The Chief Executive Officer,
                  The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board,
                  No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street,
                  Vallal Seethakathi Nagar,
                  Chennai – 600 001.

                2.The District Revenue Officer and
                  Additional District Magistrate,
                  Tiruchirappalli.

                3.The Superintendent of Police,

Office of the Superintendent of Police, Trichy District – 620 020.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchirappalli District.

5.The Tahsildar, Thiruvembur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.

6.The Inspector of Police, Thriuvembur Police Station, Trichy District.

7.The Superintendent of Waqf, Trichy Zone, Trichy District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

Nsr

Order made in

Dated:

05.03.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter