Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5106 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2024
W.A.No.1534 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 04.03.2024
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
and
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR
W.A.No.1534 of 2022
Ponnusamy
Principal Petitioner
rep. By T.Rajendan
General Power of Attorney ...Appellant
Vs.
1. The Government rep. By its
Secretary to Government,
CT & RE Department,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009
2. The Inspector General of Registration,
100, Santhom High Road,
R.A.Puram, Chennai – 600 028
3. The Sub Registrar,
Palacode,
Dharmapuri District – 636 701
4. The Sub Registrar,
Palacode,
Dharmapuri District – 636 808
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1534 of 2022
5. Veerappan ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
the order of this Court made in W.P.41430 of 2021 dated 04.08.2021.
For Appellant :Mr.A.S.Palanisam
For Respondents :Mr.B.Vijay for R1 to R4
Additional Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
The Writ Appeal has been filed against the order dated
04.08.2021 passed in W.P.No.1430 of 2021.
2. The grievances of the Writ Appellant / Writ Petitioner was that a
gift deed was executed in favour of the 5th respondent by one
Mr.Mariappan. The said Marriappan sold a portion of the property to the
Writ Appellant / Writ Petitioner. In view of the discrepancy in the
property schedule, the Appellant / Petitioner has chosen to file the Writ
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Petition.
3. Admittedly, the gift deed was executed in the year 1997 and the
Writ Petition has been instituted after a lapse of about 27 years. More
so, the Registering Officer has no powers to cancel the gift deed
executed in the year 1997. Regarding rectification of error, if any, the
same is to be corrected by the parties in the manner contemplated under
the Registration Act. However, this Court cannot issue any direction to
cancel the gift deed or the subsequent deed executed by Marriappan in
favour of the Writ Appellant / Writ Petitioner. Such disputes of civil in
nature cannot be adjudicated in the Writ Petition.
4. Thus we do not find any infirmity in respect of the order passed
by the Writ Court and the appellant is at liberty to approach the
competent Civil Court of law for redressal of his grievances.
With the above direction, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. No
costs.
[S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.]
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
04.03.2024 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No. Speaking / Non Speaking order
ssd
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,
K.RAJASEKAR, J., ssd
To
1. The Government rep. By its Secretary to Government, CT & RE Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009
2. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhom High Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai – 600 028
3. The Sub Registrar, Palacode, Dharmapuri District – 636 701
4. The Sub Registrar, Palacode, Dharmapuri District – 636 808
5. Veerappan
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
04.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!