Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8303 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2024
CMA.SR.No.120318 of 2022
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 03.6.2024
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH
CMA.SR.No.120318 of 2022
& CMP.SR.No.120319 of 2022
& CMP.No.6117 of 2023
1.Nalayini
2.Mahalakshmi ...Petitioners-
Appellants/
R1 & R2 in IA/
Plaintiffs
Vs
1.Selvi
2.Shanthi
3.Lakshmi
4.Balasubramaniyam ...R1 to R4 in
CMPs & CMA/
applicants in IA/
Defendants 1 to
3&7
5.Malliga
6.Manimegalai
7.Balavinayagam ...R5 to R7 in
CMPs & CMA/
R3 to R5 in IA
Defendants 4 to
6
APPEAL under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1 of the
Civil Procedure Code praying to set aside the fair and decretal order
dated 09.6.2022 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.98 of 2017 on
the file of the First Additional District & Sessions Court, Vellore.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
CMA.SR.No.120318 of 2022
CMP.No.6117 of 2023 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
praying to condone the delay of 37 days in filing the above appeal.
For Petitioners/
Appellants : Mr.D.Thirumoorthy
For R1 to R3 : Mr.D.Rameshkumar
R4 : deceased
R5 to R7 : served & no appearance
JUDGMENT
CMP.No.6117 of 2023 has been filed seeking to condone the
delay of 37 days in filing the appeal.
2. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs, who filed O.S.No.98
of 2017 on the file of the First Additional District & Sessions Court,
Vellore seeking for the relief of partition. In that, defendants 1 to 3
and 7 filed I.A.No.1 of 2019 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil
Procedure Code (for short, the Code) for rejection of plaint. This
application was allowed by the Court below by order dated 09.6.2022.
Aggrieved by that, the above appeal has been filed with a delay.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants and
the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4. In the considered view of this Court, an order passed rejecting
the plaint is construed as a decree under Section 2(2) of the Code and
only a regular appeal is maintainable under Section 96 read with Order
XLI of the Code. The order rejecting the plaint will not come within the
scope of Order XLIII of the Code and therefore, the above civil
miscellaneous appeal is not maintainable.
5. In the light of the above, the very maintainability of the above
civil miscellaneous appeal is under question and hence, there is no
need to go into the grounds raised in the affidavit filed in support of
the petition for condonation of delay and it must automatically go.
6. In the result, CMP.No.6117 of 2023 is closed by granting
liberty to the petitioners/appellants to file a regular appeal suit against
the order passed rejecting the plaint before the competent court.
Accordingly, the above civil miscellaneous appeal is rejected at SR
stage. Consequently, the connected CMP SR is also rejected. No costs.
03.6.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N.ANAND VENKATESH,J
RS To The First Additional District & Sessions Court, Vellore.
CMA.SR.No.120318 of 2022 &
03.6.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!