Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 78 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024
W.P.No.12832 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.12832 of 2022
B.V.Ramesh ...Petitioner
-Vs-
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Vepry,
Chennai – 600 007.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Traffic West,
Greater Chennai Police
Thirumangalam,
Chennai – 600 010.
3 M.Rajeshkumar ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2
to dismiss the third respondent from the service as per the Police
Standing Order 66(1) and (4) in view of the conviction imposed in the
judgment dated 20.05.2019 made in C.C.No.319 of 2019 on the file of
the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirutani and later confirmed in the
judgment dated 03.03.2020 made in C.A.No.73 of 2019 on the file of the
learned First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur by
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.12832 of 2022
considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.07.2021 and
18.02.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran
For Respondents
For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai
Government Advocate
For R3 : Mr.D.Dayalan
ORDER
The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1
and 2 to dismiss the third respondent from the service as per the Police
Standing Order 66(1) and (4) in view of the conviction imposed in the
judgment dated 20.05.2019 made in C.C.No.319 of 2019 on the file of
the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirutani and later confirmed in the
judgment dated 03.03.2020 made in C.A.No.73 of 2019 on the file of the
learned First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur by
considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.07.2021 and
18.02.2022.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and
perused the material placed before this Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. This writ petition has been filed to take appropriate action as
against the third respondent on the ground that the third respondent had
extra marital affairs with the wife of the petitioner. In pursuant to the said
complaint, the third respondent was convicted in C.C.No.319 of 2009 on
the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirutani. The said conviction
was also confirmed up to this Court. Simultaneously, department action
was also taken as against the third respondent and he was compulsorily
ordered to retire from his service. Therefore, already the department
action has been taken as against the third respondent.
4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands closed. There
shall be no orders as to costs.
02.01.2024 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order
rts
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,
rts
To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Vepry, Chennai – 600 007.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Traffic West, Greater Chennai Police Thirumangalam, Chennai – 600 010.
02.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!