Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 75 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024
W.P.No.35021 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.35021 of 2023
S.Saraswathy ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Commissioner,
Greater Chennai Corporation,
Rippon Building,
Chennai - 600 003.
2.The Executive Engineer,
Zone 9, Corporation of Chennai,
Royapettah,
Chennai - 600 014. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second
respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2023
seeking for transfer of Property Tax Assessment in petitioner's
favour.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.35021 of 2023
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Lokesh Raj
For Respondents : Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda
Standing counsel (Corporation)
**********
ORDER
The petitioner seeks issuance of a mandamus for the
consideration of the representation dated 21.03.2023 for transfer of
the Property Tax Assessment in favour of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner asserts that the property at No.16/7, Ramarao
Garden, 2nd Street, Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014, originally
belonged to her father, Mr.Maari Naicker, who died on 07.12.1991.
Pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 11.01.2013 in O.S.No.397
of 2012 of the VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, it is asserted
that an extent of 208 sq.ft. of land and building thereon was allotted
to the share of the petitioner.
3. Thereafter, it is stated that the petitioner applied for and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
obtained a transfer of the EB records in her name and also applied for
the transfer of the Property Tax Assessment in her favour. In spite of
the submission of the representation dated 21.03.2023, it is stated that
no action was taken.
4. Mr.P.Prithvi Chopda, learned standing counsel for the
Greater Chennai Corporation, accepts notice on behalf of both the
respondents. He submits that if the relevant documents are re-
submitted by the petitioner, the petitioner's representation would be
considered and disposed of on merits.
5. In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is
disposed of by directing the second respondent to consider the
petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2023 and dispose of the same
on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner
and the other legal heirs of Mr.Maari Naicker. The petitioner is
directed to re-submit relevant documents in this regard. The
representation of the petitioner shall be disposed of within a period
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
of six weeks from the date of receipt of the re-submitted documents
from the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.
02.01.2024 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
To
1.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai - 600 003.
2.The Executive Engineer, Zone 9, Corporation of Chennai, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
rna
02.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!