Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 73 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024
C.R.P(MD)No.3405 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.01.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.R.P(MD)No.3405 of 2023
1.S.Thilagavathi
2.Selvarani
3.Geetha
4.Minor Balaji Sidarth .. Petitioners/Judgment
Creditor/Plaintiffs
[3rd respondent is
represented by natural
guardian Geetha / 3rd
petitioner herein]
Vs.
1.Periya Natchammal
2.Rajambal
3.Anburaj
4.Kumar
5.Lakshmi
6.Usha
7.Senthil Kumar .. Respondents /
Judgement Debtor/
1st defendant's legal heirs
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No.1/6
C.R.P(MD)No.3405 of 2023
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to direct the learned District Munsif, Kulithalai,
Karur District to expedite the proceedings in EP.No.7 of 2020 in OS.No.
167 of 1987 and to complete the execution proceedings within a period
stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioners: Mr.R.Aravindraj
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to direct the
learned District Munsif, Kulithalai, Karur District, to expedite the
proceedings in EP.No.7 of 2020 in OS.No.167 of 1987 and to complete
the execution proceedings within a period stipulated by this Court.
2. The suit in O.S.No.167 of 1987 was filed by the
plaintiffs/Petitioners herein for recovery of possession and for mesne
profit before the learned Additional District Munsif, Kulithalai. After
adjudication, the trial Court dismissed the suit against which the
plaintiffs filed an appeal in A.S.No.104 of 1995 before the learned
Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai, Karur District. The said appeal was
allowed by setting aside the judgment passed in the suit. Against which
the defendants filed a second appeal before this Court in S.A.NO.331 of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1997. This Court, by judgment dated 23.03.2021, confirmed the
judgment and decree passed in the appeal suit in A.S.No.104 of 1995.
The petitioners filed execution petition seeking execution of the decree.
Pending EP proceedings, since the 5th respondent was set exparte, he
filed EA in E.A.No.6 of 2023 to set aside the exparte order. In that EA,
though the 1st petitioner herein filed her counter as early on 27.03.2023,
the execution Court granted adjournments periodically till 01.11.2023.
Further the 4th respondent/judgment debtor is seeking adjournment to
drag on the proceedings. Hence, he seeks speedy disposal of the
execution petition.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused
the materials available on record.
4. Though the 5th respondent namely, Kumar was set expare,
the second appeal was disposed of on merits by this Court. Hence,
considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and
also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court
directs the learned District Munsif, Kulithalai, Karur District to expedite
the proceedings in EP.No.7 of 2020 in O.S.No.167 of 1987 and complete
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
the process of execution within a period of three months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is
disposed of. No Costs.
02.01.2024
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
NCC : Yes/No
PJL
To
1. The District Munsif,
Thirumangalam.
2.The Section Officer,
V.R.Section,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
G.ILANGOVAN, J.
PJL
02.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!