Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 71 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024
SA.No.1800 of 1996
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
SA.No.1800 of 1996 and
CMP.No.17951 of 1996
1.Pitchamuthu
2.Kaliammal
3.Arumugham ... Appellants
-vs-
1.R.Sivagnana Mudhaliar
2.Pappathi Ammal
3.M.Subramaniam ... Respondents
(No relief claimed as against the respondents 2 and 3
since they are ex parte in all the courts and hence, they were given up)
PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 C.P.C to set
aside the decree and Judgment in A.S.No.51 of 1992, dated 30.09.1994 on
the file of the Subordinate Judges Court, Kumbakonam confirming the
decree and Judgment of the District Munsif Court, Valingaiman at
Kumbakonam passed in O.S.No.612 of 1988, dated 24.07.1992.
1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA.No.1800 of 1996
For Appellants : Mr. V.K. Vijaya Raghavan
For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal has been filed against the decree and
Judgment in A.S.No.51 of 1992, dated 30.09.1994 on the file of the
Subordinate Judges Court, Kumbakonam confirming the decree and
Judgment of the District Munsif Court, Valingaiman at Kumbakonam
passed in O.S.No.612 of 1988, dated 24.07.1992.
2. From the perusal of the records it is noticed that the
respondents 1 and 2 are no more and no relief is claimed as against the 3 rd
respondent. The appellants filed different applications to bring on record
the Legal Representatives of the deceased respondents 1 and 2 along with
applications to condone the delay in filing such application and also to set
aside the abatement caused consequent upon the death of the respondents 1
and 2 and the said applications in CMP(MD).Nos.18807 and 692 of 2023
were allowed by this Court on 07.06.2023 subject to the payment of cost
of Rs.25,000/- and Rs.10,000/- respectively in respect of the respondents 1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
and 2. Further, the said condition was not complied with by the appellants
and the applications filed seeking to reduce the cost imposed were also
dismissed by this Court. Consequently, the abatement caused consequent
upon the death of the respondents 1 and 2 had become final.
3. In the above circumstances, nothing survives for
adjudication in this appeal and accordingly, this Second Appeal is
dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition
is closed.
02.01.2024
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
trp
To
1. The Subordinate Judges Court, Kumbakonam.
2. The District Munsif Court, Valingaiman at Kumbakonam
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR. J.
trp
SA.No.1800 of 1996 and
02.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!