Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Geetha Malleswari @ Geetha Anand vs K.Venkata Subamma
2024 Latest Caselaw 30 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 30 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024

Madras High Court

Geetha Malleswari @ Geetha Anand vs K.Venkata Subamma on 2 January, 2024

Author: N. Sathish Kumar

Bench: N.Sathish Kumar

                                                                                   C.S.Nos.315 & 353 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       Dated : 02.01.2024


                                                            CORAM

                                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                                  C.S.Nos.315 & 353 of 2021
                                              and O.A.Nos. 785, 652 & 651 of 2021

                     Geetha Malleswari @ Geetha Anand
                                                                      .. Plaintiff in C.S.No.353 of 2021
                     Udaya Karthi.K                                   .. Plaintiff in C.S.No.353 of 2021


                                                             Versus

                     1.K.Venkata Subamma
                     2.K.V.Subba Rao                                        .. Defendants in both suits

                     Prayer in C.S.No.315 of 2021: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the
                     Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
                     Procedure, to pass a judgment and decree to :

                          a) declaration that the 1st defendant has no right to execute any

                                  document so as to create any charge, encumbrance or lien of any

                                  nature on the schedule property as clause 'a' of the Settlement Deed

                                  dated 12.06.2013 registered before the SRO, Thiyagaraya Nagar as


                     Page 1 / 5



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   C.S.Nos.315 & 353 of 2021

                                  document No. 1424 of 2013 is bad and non-est in law and not binding

                                  on the plaintiff herein;

                          b) permanent injunction restraining the 1st defendant from in any manner

                                  interfering with the title and disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful

                                  possession and enjoyment of the schedule property as his residence

                                  subject to the right of peaceful co-existence vested with the 1st

                                  defendant in view of the life interest reserved for the 1st defendant

                                  under the Settlement Deed dated 12.06.2013 registered before the

                                  SRO, Thiyagaraya Nagar as Doc.No.1424/2013 and;

                          c) permanent injunction restraining the 2nd defendant, his men, agents

                                  and representatives from in any manner whatsoever, entering into the

                                  schedule property or interfering with the peaceful possession,

                                  enjoyment and title of the schedule property by the plaintiff at any

                                  time.

                          d) to direct the defendants to pay costs of this suit.

                     Prayer in C.S.No.353 of 2021: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the
                     Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
                     Procedure, to pass a judgment and decree to :

                                  a. declaration that the 1st defendant has no right to execute any

                     Page 2 / 5



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                          C.S.Nos.315 & 353 of 2021

                                  document so as to create any charge, encumbrance or lien of any

                                  nature on the schedule property as clause 'a' of the Settlement Deed

                                  dated 12.06.2013 registered before the SRO, Thiyagaraya Nagar as

                                  document No. 1423 of 2013 is bad and non-est in law and not binding

                                  on the plaintiff herein;

                                  b. permanent injunction restraining the 1st defendant from in any

                                  manner interfering with the title and disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful

                                  possession and enjoyment of the schedule property as his residence

                                  subject to the right of peaceful co-existence vested with the 1st

                                  defendant in view of the life interest reserved for the 1st defendant

                                  under the Settlement Deed dated 12.06.2013 registered as

                                  Doc.No.1423/2013, SRO, Thiyagaraya Nagar and;

                                  c. permanent injunction restraining the 2nd defendant, his men, agents

                                  and representatives from in any manner whatsoever, entering into the

                                  schedule property or interfering with the peaceful possession,

                                  enjoyment and title of the schedule property by the plaintiff at any

                                  time.

                                  d. to direct the defendants to pay costs of this suit


                     Page 3 / 5



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.S.Nos.315 & 353 of 2021




                     In both suits

                                  For Plaintiffs     :   Mr.M.L.Joesph
                                                         for M/s.Chennai Law Associates

                                  For Defendants     :   Mr.A.Ganesan

                                                   COMMON JUDGMENT


The learned counsel for the plaintiffs seeks permission of this

Court to withdraw these Civil Suits and he has also made endorsements to

that effect.

2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the

plaintiffs and the endorsements so made, these Civil Suits are dismissed as

withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected applications stands closed.

02.01.2024 dhk Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non Speaking order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.Nos.315 & 353 of 2021

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

dhk

C.S.Nos.315 & 353 of 2021 and O.A.Nos. 785, 652 & 651 of 2021

02.01.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter