Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unknown vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2024 Latest Caselaw 25 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024

Madras High Court

Unknown vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 2 January, 2024

Author: G.Chandrasekharan

Bench: G.Chandrasekharan

                                                       W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                          DATED: 02.01.2024

                                              CORAM:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

                                         W.P.No.26477 of 2010
                                                 and
                                         W.P.No.11378 of 2011


                 1.S.Subramanian

                 2. S.C.Mallusamy

                 3.M.Ayyanar

                 4.V.V.Rajan

                 5.T.Nagarajan

                 6.V.Rajaraman

                 7.S.James Albert Paul

                 8.A.David

                 9.C.Shanmugham

                 10.P.Chinnaiyan

                 11.A.Ramasamy

                 12.S.Palanichamy


                 ________
                  Page 1 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                         W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

                 13.V.Vellaisamy

                 14.K.Duraisingam

                 15.N.Thillainayagam

                 16.V.Alagirisamy

                 17.S.Rangaswamy

                 18.M.Jayapaul

                 19.M.Chinniah

                 20.J.Kamaraj

                 21.R.Pandian

                 22.J.Sakthivel

                 23.A.Jayashree

                 24.R.Bagyam

                 25.S.Pandian

                 26.K.Rangachari

                 27.D.Gnanaraj

                 28. S.Murugesan

                 29.Mercelene Florence

                 30.M.Ramachandran

                 31.C.Anantharaj

                 ________
                  Page 2 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                             W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011



                 32. A.Thirugnanam

                 33. M.Liakat Ali

                 34.S.Kannan

                 35.A.S.Prakasam

                 36.S.Parvathy

                 37.V.Arappalli

                 38. P.T.Ponnuraj

                 39.K.Subbaian

                 40.S.Kumarasamy

                 41.N.Gunasekaran

                 42.N.Ramachandran

                 43.L.Kanchanamala

                 44.S.Chandra

                 45.L.Shyamala Mani

                 46.P.Vijayam

                 47.M.Thevamani

                 48.N.Dhanalakshmi    ....Petitioners in W.P.No.26477 of 2010




                 ________
                  Page 3 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                        W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011




                 1. N.Sarangan

                 2. R.Neelamegam

                 3. S.Sivanseyal

                 4. M.Rathinsabapathy

                 5. C.Kalliyaperumal

                 6. A.Shanmugam

                 7. M.Abdul Hadhi

                 8.R.Girija

                 9. S.Mariadoss

                 10.A.Panneerselvam

                 11.C.Rajendran

                 12. K.Ettiagoundar

                 13. K.Pandurangan

                 14.P.Aravamudhan

                 15.P.Pichamuthu

                 16.B.Ramalingam

                 17. K.Chinnasamy

                 18.D.Alavandar

                 ________
                  Page 4 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                           W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011



                 19. K.N.Narayanasamy

                 20. V.Elangovan

                 21. G.Surendran

                 22. N.Mahadevan

                 23.G.Natarajan

                 24.S.Muthukumaran

                 25.S.Dhanapalan

                 26.S.Thirunavukkarasu

                 27. M.D.Rajarathinam

                 28.G.Ramanujam

                 29.N.Ramalingam

                 30.M.Jayaraman

                 31.S.Krishanmurthi

                 32.R.sSenthamaraikannan

                 33.R.Ramadoss
                 34.V.Amirthavalli

                 35.M.Thambiraj

                 36.R.Paramasivam

                 37.D.Pandurangan

                 ________
                  Page 5 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                          W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011



                 38.V.Paramasivam

                 39. M.Ranganathan

                 40. P.Arasappan

                 41.M.Rajamanickam

                 42.S.Ramasamy

                 43.K.O.S.Bahurdeen

                 44.R.Dhanalakshmi

                 45.V.Chidambaram

                 46.S.Kamala

                 47.S.Periyayal

                 48.R.Thirupurasundari

                 49.K.Kasthori

                 50.P.Boopathy                   ....Petitioners in W.P.No.11378 of 2011


                                                    Vs

                 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu
                    Represented by Secretary to the Government,
                    School Education Department,
                    Fort St. George,
                    Chennai – 600 009.



                 ________
                  Page 6 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

                 2. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                    Represented by its Secretary,
                    Finance Department,
                    Fort St. George,
                    Chennai – 600 009.

                 3. The Director of School Education,
                    College Road,
                    Chennai – 600 006.                       .... Respondents in both W.Ps


                 COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of

                 Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,

                 calling for the records of the first and third respondent in relation to letter

                 No.25103/A1/09-2             dated       21.01.2010        and        proceedings

                 Na.Ka.No.82853/C1/C2/09 dated 25.02.2010 respectively and quash the

                 same and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to extend the

                 benefit of the G.O.Ms.No.1581, Education Department dated 06.11.1989 to

                 the petitioners as well in the way and manner as implemented as in the case

                 of “A” wing teachers and to grant arrears of pay and pension.

                                  For Petitioners     : Mr.R.Saseetharan
                                  For Respondents : Mr.K.Thippu Sulthan
                                                    Government Advocate (Crl.Side)




                 ________
                  Page 7 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

                                            COMMON ORDER

The Writ Petitions have been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified

Mandamus challenging a letter dated 21.01.2010 bearing reference

No.25103/A1/09-2 and proceedings dated 25.02.2010 bearing reference

Na.Ka.No.82853/C1/C2/09 respectively passed by the first and third

respondents and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to

extend the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.1581, Education Department, dated

06.11.1989 to the petitioners as well, in the way and manner as in the case

“A” wing teachers and to grant arrears of pay and pension.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, in a similar

writ petition filed by similarly placed employees in W.P.No.25673 of 2011,

this Court on 27.11.2023, taking note of the fact that similar Writ Petitions

filed by similarly placed employees were dismissed and Writ Appeals in

W.A.No.1214 of 2014 etc., were also dismissed and the aggrieved parties

ie., similarly place employees have filed SLP(C)D.No.12761 of 2020 before

the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and when that matter is pending,

considering the dismissal of Writ Petition, Writ Appeals and pendency of

SLP, this Court has passed the following order:

________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

“6. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of on the following terms

(i) The prayer in the writ petition shall stand dismissed in terms of the judgment of this Court dated 19.08.2019 in W.A.No.1214 of 2014 etc.,:

(ii) In the event, SLP(C)D.No.12761 of 2020 is allowed and any relief is granted in favour of the petitioners therein ie., P.R.Rengasamy and others, it is open for the writ petitioners to make a representation before the respondents and upon the receipt of the said representation along with the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court, it would be incumbent upon the respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioners in terms of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.”

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks this Court to pass similar

order.

3. Taking note of the fact that, the Writ Petitions and Writ Appeals

filed for similar relief were dismissed and that against the dismissal of Writ

Appeal, SLP(C)D.No.12761 of 2020 is pending before the Hon'ble

Supreme Court of India, this Court passes the following order:

________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

(i) The prayer in the writ petitions shall stand

dismissed in terms of the judgment of this Court dated

19.08.2019 in W.A.No.1214 of 2014 etc.,:

(ii) In the event, SLP(C)D.No.12761 of 2020 is allowed

and any relief is granted in favour of the petitioners therein ie.,

P.R.Rengasamy and others, it is open for the writ petitioners to

make a representation before the respondents and upon the

receipt of the said representation along with the order of

Hon'ble Supreme Court, it would be incumbent upon the

respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioners in terms of

the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

02.01.2024

Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Sma

________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

To

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Finance Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

3. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J

Sma

W.P.Nos.26477 of 2010 & 11378 of 2011

02.01.2024

________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter