Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16009 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2024
W.A(MD)No.1049 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 19.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
W.A(MD)No.1049 of 2013
and
M.P(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2013
The Correspondent
S.D.H. Jain Vidhyalaya Matriculation School,
Thiruppalai,
Madurai- 14 ... Appellant/2nd Respondent
.Vs.
1. P.Latha ..1st Respondent/Writ Petitioner
2. The Inspector of Matriculation School
Thallakulam, Madurai ..2nd Respondents/ 1st Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this
Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD) No.7738 of 2005
dated 20.04.2011.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.1049 of 2013
For Appellant : Mr.V.Janakiramulu
For R1 : Mr.Ramsunarvijayraj
for M/s.Veera Associates
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.VELMURUGAN.,J)
The present Writ Appeal has been filed to set aside the order passed by
this Court in W.P(MD) No.7738 of 2005 dated 20.04.2011
2. The first respondent has challenged the termination order passed by the
appellant in the writ appeal. The Writ petition was allowed on the ground that the
order of termination was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. The
first respondent has alternative remedy and without the availing alternate remedy,
he has approached the Writ Court which is against law.
3. On persual of the order of the learned Single Judge, it is seen that the
order has been passed on the ground that the termination order has been passed
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
in violation of principles of natural justice which is against settled preposition of
law. Even though alternative remedy is available, without availing the same he
has filed the Writ Petition by invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Hence, this Court finds that there is no perversity or infirmity in the order passed
by the learned Single Judge.
4. Now, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that
the respondent has submitted his resignation letter before the appellant and the
same was also accepted. Therefore nothing survives for further adjudication in the
writ appeal . However learned counsel appearing for the respondent only seeks
experience certificate from the appellant for the period in which he served in
the appellant/school.
5. In view of the same, the appellant is directed to issue suitable experience
certificate to the first respondent for the period he served in the school.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
6.With the above direction, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of. No costs.
Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[P.V.,J.] [K.K.R.K.,J.]
19.08.2024
NCS : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
aav
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
and
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.
aav
19.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!