Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15214 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024
W.P.No.21886 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P No.21886 of 2024
P.Ayyaswamy ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Registrar
Coimbatore District Registration Department
Coimbatore.
2.The Sub-Registrar
The Sub-Registrar's Office
Gandhipuram
Coimbatore.
3.K.Chinnasamy ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pass an
appropriate order cancelling the sale deed dated 09.05.2007 registered as
Document No.3339 of 2007 on the file of the second respondent and as a
sequel, to remove the said entry from the encumbrances certificate by
considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2024.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
W.P.No.21886 of 2024
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kannan
For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay for R1 & R2
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to pass
appropriate order cancelling the sale deed dated 09.05.2007 registered as
Document No.3339 of 2007 on the file of the second respondent by
considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2024.
2. There is no enabling provision in the Registration Act,
empowering the second respondent to cancel the sale deed already registered.
Therefore, the prayer in the Writ Petition cannot be entertained. The learned
counsel for the petitioner further submitted that in view of the observation
made by the Civil Court in OS.No.254 of 2005, the sale deed in favour of the
third respondent can be cancelled.
3. It is seen from the decree passed in OS.No.254 of 2005 there is
no clause in the decree cancelling the sale deed dated 09.05.2007 executed in
favour of the third respondent. Further perusal of judgment in O.S.No.254 of
2005 would suggest that Civil Court found that sale deed in favour of third
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondent was valid to the extent of share of the first defendant in the suit
Palanisamy/father of petitioner. Hence, entire sale in favour of third respondent
was not held to be invalid. In such circumstances petitioner cannot maintain a
prayer for cancellation of entire sale deed.
4. In the absence of specific clause in the decree passed by the
Civil Court, prayer for cancellation of registered document sought for by the
petitioner cannot be entertained. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No
costs.
06.08.2024
(2/2)
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order dna
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To
1.The District Registrar Coimbatore District Registration Department Coimbatore.
2.The Sub-Registrar The Sub-Registrar's Office Gandhipuram Coimbatore.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
dna
(2/2)
06.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!