Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7830 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2024
2024:MHC:1912
W.A.(MD)No.720 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
W.A.(MD)No.720 of 2024
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.5429 of 2024
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
(Madurai) Ltd., Bye Pass Road,
Madurai – 625 016.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Dindigul Division,
Dindigul – 624 004. : Appellants
Vs.
1.Annalakshmi
2.Prabhavathy : Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent,
praying to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)
No.4667of 2015 dated 16.12.2022 and allow the Writ Appeal.
For Appellant : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh
For Respondent No.1 : Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
W.A.(MD)No.720 of 2024
JUDGMENT
************** [Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.]
This Writ Appeal has been directed against the order
passed by the Writ Court made in W.P.(MD)No.4667of 2015 dated
16.12.2022.
2.In fact, that was a common order passed in two Writ
Petitions filed by the mother and daughter, who are the wife and
daughter of the deceased employee of the appellant Transport
Corporation.
3.The first respondent was the second wife who got
married with the deceased employee on 03.12.2000, before which
the first wife died in the year 2000, for which, the learned Counsel
for the first respondent submitted that the marriage was
solemnized between them as a valid marriage and therefore, she is
the only surviving wife and she is entitled to family pension payable
to the wife of the deceased employee.
4.The daughter of the deceased employee also claim the
retiral benefits by filing a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.4668 of 2015.
It is brought to our notice that insofar as the retiral benefits is
concerned, as the deceased employee has availed a loan from the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Transport Corporation and in order to repay the same, the entire
retiral benefits have to be set off, therefore, nothing would be
available to pass on to the legal heirs of the deceased employee.
These are all admitted facts.
5.When that being so, the direction given by the learned
Judge in the impugned order that, the first respondent herein is
entitled for family pension, as she was the only surviving legally
wedded wife of the deceased employee is in order and we do not
find any reason to interfere with the said order. Therefore, the
challenge that has been made against the said order, naturally has
to fail and accordingly, it fails.
6.Hence, the order passed by the writ court is approved
and the Writ Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to
costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.S.K.,J.] & [G.A.M.,J.]
22.04.2024
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
MR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.
MR
ORDER MADE IN
22.04.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!