Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7811 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2024
WP(MD) No.9523 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
W.P.(MD) No.9523 of 2024
Soliyammal ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Erode District,
Erode – 638 001.
2.The Treasury Officer,
District Treasury,
Collectorate Campus,
Thanthonimalai,
Karur – 639 007. ...Respondents
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP(MD) No.9523 of 2024
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to complete
the enquiry of the first respondent with respect to the
communication given by the second respondent dated 12.01.2024.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muthu Ganesa Pandian
For Respondents : Mr.J.Ashok
Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ
of Mandamus to complete the enquiry of the first respondent in
respect to the communication received from the second respondent
dated 12.01.2024.
2. Heard Mr.K.Muthu Ganesa Pandian, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mr.J.Ashok, learned Additional Government
Pleader appearing for the respondents.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken
up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
4. The petitioner, who has given with a family pension
considering her relationship with the deceased late.Samuvel, as his
wife has been deprived of getting the said family pension on
account of the suit filed by the first wife's children in O.S.No.551 of
2005 and obtained a decree. The said suit in O.S.No.551 of 2005 is
filed to stall the pensionary benefits and get an exparte decree.
Subsequently, the petitioner had given a representation to the first
respondent to release the family pension, for which, the second
respondent has sought a clarification with the first respondent
whether the family pension be released to Mrs.Soliyammal, the
petitioner herein.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the petitioner herself has filed a suit in O.S.No.715 of 2008 for
declaration that the decree passed in O.S.No.551 of 2005 is null and
void and got a decree in her favour on 20.10.2010.
6. However, the learned Additional Government Pleader
submitted that as against the said judgment passed in O.S.No.715 of
2008, the first wife’s children has preferred an appeal in A.S.No.118
of 2010 and the same was allowed on 29.06.2012.
7. In such case, it is for the second respondent to give
his clarification to the first respondent after ascertaining from the
petitioner whether she had filed any second appeal in order to
enable him to pass further orders. On receipt of such clarification,
the first respondent shall pass orders as expeditiously as possible.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
8. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is
disposed of. No costs.
18.04.2024
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No
RM
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode – 638 001.
2.The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Collectorate Campus, Thanthonimalai, Karur – 639 007.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.N.MANJULA, J.
RM
Order made in
Dated:
18.04.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!