Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7575 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2024
W.A.(MD) No.239 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.04.2024
CORAM
JUSTICE N. SESHASAYEE
and
JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
W.A.(MD) No.239 of 2018
and
C.M.P.(MD) No.1381 of 2018
R.S.Sornam ... Appellant/3rd Party
Vs.
1.R.Rathinam ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner
2.The District Collector,
Tuticorin District,
Tuticorin.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tuticorin.
4.The Tahsildar,
Srivaikuntam Taluk,
Tuticorin District. ... Respondents 2 to 4/Respondents
_________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD) No.239 of 2018
Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated
11.12.2014 made in W.P.(MD) No.20112 of 2014.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Selvan
For RR2 to 4 : Mr.A.Baskaran
Additional Government Pleader
For R1 : No appearance
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.Seshasayee, J.)
This appeal is preferred by a 3rd party to W.P.(MD) No.20112 of 2014, which
came to be disposed of by a learned Single Judge of this Court vide his order
dated 11.12.2014, whereunder the learned Judge has directed the 3rd
respondent before him viz., the Tahsildar, Srivaikuntam Taluk to consider the
petitioner's representation dated 17.05.2014 which he had made for issuance
of patta to properties in R.S.Nos.105b/2b, 72/1, 94/1, 98/3, 100/3, 67 and 68.
2. The contention of the appellant is that he is the original owner of the
property and the writ petitioner seeks issuance of patta based on a collusive
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
decree obtained by him in O.S.No.87 of 2009 on the file of the Sub Court,
Tuticorin to which the present appellant is not a party. The learned counsel
also submitted that the said decree later came to be set aside by this Court in
C.R.P.(MD) No.1318 of 2012 vide order dated 18.10.2019.
3. This Court may not enter into a finding vis-a-vis the title to the property,
which eventually may have to be decided by a competent civil Court. So far
as the present issue is concerned, this Court merely directs the 4th respondent
herein (3rd respondent before the Writ Court) to issue notice both to the writ
petitioner as well as to this appellant and act strictly in accordance with law.
4. With the above direction, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(N.S.S., J.) (P.V.M., J.)
NCC : Yes/No 08.04.2024
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes
ABR
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N. SESHASAYEE, J.
and P.VADAMALAI, J.
ABR To
1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tuticorin.
3.The Tahsildar, Srivaikuntam Taluk, Tuticorin District. W.A.(MD) No.239 of 2018
08.04.2024
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!