Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7443 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024
W.A(MD)No.147 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.04.2024
CORAM
JUSTICE N. SESHASAYEE
and
JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
W.A(MD) No.147 of 2017
and
C.M.P(MD)Nos.1589 and 1590 of 2017
Selvaraj ... Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintending Engineer,
Tamilnadu Generation of Electricity and
Distribution Corporation,
Ramanathapuram.
2.The Assistant Electrical Engineer,
Urban/North,
Ramanathapuram.
3.Sridharan ... Respondents/Respondents
Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order
dated 04.01.2017 made in W.P(MD)No.11353 of 2013.
_________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.147 of 2017
For Appellant :Mr.S.Muthukrishnan
For R-1 & R-2 :Mr.S.M.S.Johny Basha
For R-3 :Mr.J.Barathan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.SESHASAYEE, J.)
The present writ appeal is filed challenging the order of a learned Single
Judge in W.P(MD)No.11353 of 2013, dated 04.01.2017.
2. The grievance of the appellant/writ petitioner was that a notice for
disconnection of electricity connection upon the TANGEDCO finding that
the very application submitted for obtaining electricity connection was forged
as it had the signature of dead persons.
3. Before the learned Single Judge, a copy of the alleged fabricated
application was produced and taking into account the facts put forth before
him, the learned Single Judge had passed an order holding that the Court
cannot aid those who engaged in fraudulent practices and dismissed the writ
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
petition. This order of the learned Single Judge is now under challenge.
4.1 Heard both sides and perused the materials. The learned counsel for the
appellant submitted that the application produced before the learned Single
Judge is not the application which the appellant had filed. However, this
aspect of the matter does not appear to have been taken before the learned
Single Judge as the order under challenge does not disclose any such fact.
4.2 According to the learned counsel for the third respondent, it is an
afterthought invented for sustaining this appeal.
5. Without getting into the merits of the rival contentions, this Court merely
directs that the appellant, if he is so desirous, to make an application for
electricity connection within a period of four weeks from the date on which
this order is hosted in the official web-site and the respondents 1 and 2, shall
take a call only after putting the third respondent herein on notice about the
same. Till then, the parties shall maintain status-quo as on today.
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
6. This writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No Costs. Consequently,
connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
(N.S.S., J.) (P.V.M., J.)
03.04.2024
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes
PM
To
1.The Superintending Engineer,
Tamilnadu Generation of Electricity and Distribution Corporation, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Urban/North, Ramanathapuram.
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N. SESHASAYEE, J.
and P.VADAMALAI, J.
PM
03.04.2024
_________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!