Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

C.Mano Ranjitham vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2023 Latest Caselaw 13985 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13985 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2023

Madras High Court
C.Mano Ranjitham vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 18 October, 2023
                                                                         W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020




                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 18.10.2023

                                                      CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                           W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020
                                                     and
                                    W.M.P(MD)Nos.14820 of 2020 & 20531 of 2023

                C.Mano Ranjitham,
                Secondary Grade Teacher,
                R.C. Primary School, Ayankulam,
                Tirunelveli District-627 007.                          ... Petitioner

                                                       Vs.

                1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                  Represented by its Secretary,
                  Department of School Education,
                  Fort St. George, Chennai-09.

                2.The Director of School Education,
                  College Road, Chennai-06.

                3.The Director of Elementary Education,
                  College Road, Chennai-06.

                4.The Chief Educational Officer,
                  Tenkasi District at Tenkasi.

                5.The District Educational Officer,
                  Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                1/9
                                                                         W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020




                6.The District Educational Officer,
                  Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

                7.The Block Educational Officer,
                  Kuruvikulam, Tenkasi District.

                8.The Block Educational Officer,
                  Palayamkottai Rural,
                  Nellaiappar High Road, Tirunelveli,
                  Tirunelveli District.

                9.The Correspondent,
                  R.C Primary School, Sevalkulam,
                  Tenkasi District.

                10.The Correspondent,
                   R.C Primary School, Ayankulam,
                   Tirunelveli District-627 007.

                11.The District Educational Officer (Elementary),
                   Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

                12.The District Elementary Educational Officer,
                   Tirunelveli District,
                   Tirunelveli.                                        ... Respondents

                (R-11 and R-12 are impleaded vide Court order, dated
                26.07.2023 in W.M.P(MD)No.14769 of 2023 in
                W.P(MD)No.17746 of 2020)

                Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to
                approve forthwith the appointment of the petitioner as Secondary Grade
                Teacher in the ninth respondent School namely, R.C Primary School,




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                2/9
                                                                              W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020




                Sevalkulam, Tenkasi district with effect from 25.03.2003 and disburse all
                attendant benefits and allowances.


                                     For Petitioner    : Mr.S.Xavier Rajini

                                     For R-1 to R-8 &
                                     R-11 & R-12      : Mr.V.Om Prakash
                                                        Government Advocate

                                     For R-9 & R-10    : No appearance


                                                      ORDER

The present writ petition was filed originally with a prayer for a

Mandamus directing the respondents to approve the appointment of the writ

petitioner as a Secondary Grade Teacher with effect from 25.03.2003. After

filing of the writ petition, the Department took an objection that an order has

been passed on 14.08.2007, approving the appointment of the petitioner with

effect from 01.11.2004. Without challenging the said order, the present writ

petition for a Mandamus is not maintainable. Pursuant to the said defence taken

by the State, the petitioner had filed W.M.P(MD)No.14772 of 2023 to amend

the prayer in order to incorporate the prayer for quashing the order, dated

14.08.2007 passed by the twelfth respondent. The said application was allowed

by this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020

2. One Sahaya Jeya Rani, who was working as a Secondary Grade

Teacher had resigned from her job on 13.11.2002. A perusal of the staff

fixation order for the academic year 2002 - 2003 reveals that the ninth

respondent School is entitled to fill up one post of Head Master and 3 posts of

Secondary Grade Teachers. The petitioner was appointed as a Secondary Grade

Teacher on 25.03.2003 in the vacancy created by the resignation of Sahaya Jeya

Rani. On the date when the petitioner was appointed, she was the third

Secondary Grade Teacher in the said School. Therefore, it is clear that the

appointment of the petitioner cannot be found to be defective on the ground of

surplus.

3. The order impugned in the writ petition has been passed on 14.08.2007

approving the appointment with effect from 01.11.2004. A perusal of the

additional typed set of papers filed by the writ petitioner indicates that the

School had forwarded the proposal for the approval of the appointment of the

writ petitioner on 24.11.2003 itself. The said proposal was returned by the

Additional Assistant Elementary Education Officer on 21.06.2004 seeking

certain clarifications. Thereafter, the School has forwarded the proposal for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020

second time along with the clarification. The said proposal was pending for

long time and the same has been approved by an order, dated 14.08.2007

granting approval to the appointment of the writ petitioner only with effect

from 01.11.2004. A perusal of the counter affidavit filed by the Department

does not disclose any special reason whatsoever for granting approval to the

appointment of the writ petitioner from 01.11.2004 instead of granting approval

from the date of her appointment, namely, 25.03.2003.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official

respondents has relied upon G.O(Ms)No.4 (School Education (X2)

Department), dated 19.01.2004 and contended that the Teachers appointed on

vacancies arising from 01.06.2003 in an aided School should remain on a

consolidated pay for a period of five years. Only because of the said reason, the

petitioner's appointment was approved from 01.11.2004 onwards.

5. The learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner brought to the

notice of the Court that the said issue has already been settled by the Hon'ble

Division Bench of this Court by an order, dated 23.07.2008 in W.A.No.190 of

2007 (The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020

School Education and Others Vs. R.Padma Sheela Rani and Another) and in

W.P.No.2474 of 2005 (S.Asirvatham Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu,

Represented by its Secretary to Government, Department of School

Education and Others), dated 23.07.2008. A perusal of the judgments of the

Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court clearly shows that, where a vacancy

arises prior to 01.06.2003 and an appointment is also made to that post, they

would not fall under G.O(Ms)No.4 and on the other hand, they would be

covered only under G.O(Ms)No.79 (School Education) Department, dated

14.06.2002.

6. In the present case, admittedly, the petitioner was appointed on

25.03.2003 much prior to the cut-off date of 01.06.2003. Therefore, this Court

is convinced of the fact that the impugned order passed by the twelfth

respondent herein fixing the date of approval from 01.11.2004 is not legally

sustainable and the same is liable to be set aside.

7. In view of the above said discussions, the order impugned in the writ

petition is set aside insofar as the portion in which the approval is granted from

01.11.2004 onwards. Due to administrative reasons, the powers of the twelfth

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020

respondent have been conferred upon the eleventh respondent. Therefore, the

eleventh respondent is directed to grant approval to the appointment of the writ

petitioner as a Secondary Grade Teacher with effect from 25.03.2003 onwards.

The said exercise shall be completed within a period of eight (8) weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. This writ petition stands allowed, accordingly. There shall be no order

as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.




                                                                                   18.10.2023



                NCC               : Yes / No
                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes
                BTR



                To

                1.The Secretary,
                  The State of Tamil Nadu,
                  Department of School Education,
                  Fort St. George, Chennai-09.

                2.The Director of School Education,
                  College Road, Chennai-06.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                                                                    W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020




3.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-06.

4.The Chief Educational Officer, Tenkasi District at Tenkasi.

5.The District Educational Officer, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.

6.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

7.The Block Educational Officer, Kuruvikulam, Tenkasi District.

8.The Block Educational Officer, Palayamkottai Rural, Nellaiappar High Road, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

9.The Correspondent, R.C Primary School, Sevalkulam, Tenkasi District.

10.The Correspondent, R.C Primary School, Ayankulam, Tirunelveli District-627 007.

11.The District Educational Officer (Elementary), Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

12.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

BTR

W.P.(MD).No.17746 of 2020

18.10.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter