Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Secretary vs G.Sakthi Rao
2023 Latest Caselaw 13761 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13761 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 October, 2023

Madras High Court
The Secretary vs G.Sakthi Rao on 11 October, 2023
    2023/MHC/4608




                                                                 W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023



                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 11.10.2023

                                                      CORAM:

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                       and
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN


                                              W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023
                                                        and
                                             C.M.P.(MD) No.8388 of 2023


                 The Secretary
                 Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
                 TNPSC Road
                 Park Town
                 Chennai-600 003                                                ... Appellant

                                                        -vs-


                 1.G.Sakthi Rao

                 2.The Chief Secretary
                   Government of Tamil Nadu
                   Secretariat, St.George Fort
                   Chennai-600 009

                 3.The Secretary
                   Department of Higher Education
                   Government of Tamil Nadu
                   Secretariat, St.George Fort
                   Chennai-600 009                                              ... Respondents



                 ____________
                 Page 1 of 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023




                           Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the

                 order, dated 20.01.2023, passed in W.P.(MD) No.26878 of 2019, on the file of

                 this Court.


                                  For Appellant     : Mr.Isaac Mohanlal, Senior Counsel
                                                      assisted by Mr.J.Anandkumar

                                  For Respondents   : Mr.G.Sakthi Rao
                                                      Party-in-Person for R1
                                                      Mr.D.Sadiq Raja
                                                      Additional Government Pleader for R2 & R3



                                                       JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single

Judge, dated 20.01.2023, passed in W.P.(MD) No.26878 of 2019.

2. A recruitment notification for selection and appointment to

Group-I Services in the Government of Tamil Nadu was notified on 01.01.2019

to fill up 181 Group-I vacancies. Of which, 20% of the vacancies are reserved

for the Persons Studied in Tamil Medium (PSTM) Quota. The first respondent,

admittedly, participated in the process of selection by stating that he is eligible

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023

to avail the PSTM quota as per the notification issued by the Tamil Nadu

Public Service Commission. The first respondent has studied in Tamil

medium upto higher secondary course and completed his B.Com. Degree in

English medium and thereafter passed three years law course in Tamil

medium. Subsequently, he has completed M.Com. Degree in Tamil medium.

The grievance of the first respondent is that the law degree obtained by him

through Tamil medium was not taken into consideration for the purpose of

granting the benefit of PSTM quota and thus, he was not selected.

3. The first respondent, who appeared in person, made a

submission that some unqualified persons were appointed under PSTM quota

and more specifically his classmate, who studied B.L.Course in Tamil medium

was appointed under PSTM quota and therefore, the learned Single Judge has

considered his case as a special case for appointment to Group-I services.

4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant mainly

contended that the online application submitted by the first respondent itself

would be sufficient to understand that the first respondent had acquired

B.Com., Degree in English medium. The online application submitted by the

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023

first respondent would reveal that he completed B.Com., Degree in English

medium in the year 2008.

5. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant further

stated that the cut off mark for Backward Class candidates under PSTM quota

was 401 and the last candidate, who was selected and appointed, had secured

401 marks. The first respondent, who is a BC candidate, has secured 379.5

marks. Therefore, the first respondent did not come within the zone of

consideration.

6. When the first respondent did not come within the zone of

consideration under PSTM quota and has scored only 379.5 marks and the

cut off mark was 401, we are not inclined to consider the case of the first

respondent for selection to Group-I Services in the Government of Tamil Nadu

under PSTM quota.

7. The first respondent has admittedly competed his B.Com.,

Degree through English medium and therefore, he is not eligible to avail the

benefit of PSTM quota as per the recruitment notification. The learned Single

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023

Judge, though considered this fact, has granted the relief of selection and

appointment of the first respondent as a special case. In the event of granting

any such special concession to a particular candidate, it will result in

discrimination and there are several other candidates, who are all longing to

secure public employment through open competitive process.

8. Equal opportunity in public employment is the constitutional

mandate. All selections are to be made strictly in accordance with the

statutes, rules and the conditions stipulated in the recruitment notification.

9. In the present case, the process of selection was completed and

the selected candidates were appointed in Group-I services in the Government

of Tamil Nadu in various Departments. In the event of considering the case of

the first respondent as a special case, it would result in discrimination

amongst the other eligible candidates, who are standing near the cut off

marks. Therefore, the special concession extended to the first respondent is

not in consonance with the established principles. Thus, we find that the

relief granted to the first first respondent by the learned Single Judge is

perverse and accordingly, we are inclined to interfere with the impugned order.

____________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023

10. In the result, the writ appeal is allowed and the order of the

learned Single Judge, dated 20.01.2023, passed in W.P.(MD) No.26878 of

2019, is set aside. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition

is closed.

                                                            [S.M.S., J.]          [V.L.N., J.]
                                                                     11.10.2023
                 NCC      : Yes / No
                 Index : Yes / No
                 Internet : Yes / No

                 krk

                 To:
                 1.The Chief Secretary,
                   Government of Tamil Nadu,
                   Secretariat, St.George Fort,
                   Chennai-600 009.

                 2.The Secretary,
                   Department of Higher Education,
                   Government of Tamil Nadu,
                   Secretariat, St.George Fort,
                   Chennai-600 009.




                 ____________


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                     W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023




                                           S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
                                                          and
                                       V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

                                                                krk




                                   W.A.(MD) No.1094 of 2023
                                             and
                                  C.M.P.(MD) No.8388 of 2023




                                          11.10.2023

                 ____________


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter