Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Director vs S.Rajaram
2023 Latest Caselaw 13579 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13579 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2023

Madras High Court
The Director vs S.Rajaram on 6 October, 2023
                                                                                   W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED: 06.10.2023

                                                        CORAM

                                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                      AND
                                  THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                               W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016
                                                         and
                                      C.M.P.(MD).Nos.4580 of 2016 and 7050 of 2018

                     1.The Director,
                       The Directorate of School Education,
                       College Road,
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Educational Department,
                       Theni,
                       Theni District.

                     3.The Headmaster,
                       Government Higher Secondary School,
                       Vadugapatti,
                       Theni District.                                   .. Appellants/Respondents

                                                           Vs.

                     S.Rajaram                                              ..Respondent/Petitioner

                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside
                     the order dated 17.04.2012 passed in W.P.(MD).No.12816 of 2011 on the
                     file of this Court and thereby allow this appeal.

                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016

                                       For Appellants   : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja
                                                          Additional Government Pleader
                                      For Respondent    : Mr.B.Prahalad Ravi

                                                        JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.)

The Writ Appeal has been instituted challenging the order dated

17.04.2012 passed in W.P.(MD).No.12817 of 2011.

2. The issue raised in the Writ Appeal on hand is whether the

respondent is entitled to get two incentive increments for the additional

educational qualification possessed by him, i.e., M.Sc. Agriculture and

B.Ed.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the

appellants mainly contended that the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.240,

School Education Department, dated 18.08.2010, prescribing eligibility

criteria for grant of two incentive increments to the teachers in their entire

service. The said Government Order unambiguously stipulates that for the

post of Vocational instructors for Agriculture, B.Sc. Agriculture is the basic

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016

qualification and two incentive increments, one for M.Sc. Agriculture and

another for M.Phil., or Ph.D., may be granted. It is not in dispute that the

writ petitioner has already received one incentive increment for the

educational qualification of M.Sc. Agriculture. The second incentive

increment claimed for B.Ed. Degree was denied on the ground that the

Vocational Instructors for Agriculture possessing B.Ed degree are not

eligible to get incentive increment.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent raised an objection by

stating that cases of similarly placed persons were considered on earlier

occasions and two incentive increments were granted. In respect of the said

submission, we are not inclined to consider the same, since any erroneous

consideration or incorrect decision cannot be followed as a precedent and

more so, in the present case, the scheme of incentive increment has been

well enumerated by the Government in its order.

5. The scheme of incentive increment is a concession granted by the

Government to the teachers to encourage them to acquire higher educational

qualification for the benefits of the children studying in educational

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016

institutions. Since it is a concession, it is to be sanctioned strictly in

accordance with the Government schemes and the Court cannot re-write the

eligibility criteria already fixed by the Government for grant of incentive

increment to the teaching staffs. Therefore, the learned Single Judge has

failed to consider these aspects and granted incentive increment for the

qualification of B.Ed degree in favour of the respondent, which is not

contemplated under the scheme of incentive increment by the Government.

In the event of extending the scope of the scheme, the same will result in

financial loss to the Government as the scheme itself is extended by way of

concession to the teachers. That being the factum, we find merit in the

contentions raised by the appellants and accordingly, the order dated

17.04.2012 passed in W.P.(MD).No.12816 of 2011 is set aside.

6. The Writ Appeal stands allowed. There shall be no order as to

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.




                                                                      (S.M.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.)
                                                                              06.10.2023
                     NCC      : Yes / No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     Lm




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                              W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016



                     To

                     1.The Director,
                       The Directorate of School Education,
                       College Road,
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Educational Department,
                       Theni,
                       Theni District.

                     3.The Headmaster,
                       Government Higher Secondary School,
                       Vadugapatti,
                       Theni District.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                             W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016

                                       S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.
                                                     and
                                   V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.

                                                                Lm




                                      W.A.(MD).No.718 of 2016




                                                      06.10.2023







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter