Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5066 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 May, 2023
Writ Appeal No.1106 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 17.05.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR
RAMAMOORTHY
Writ Appeal No.1106 of 2023
and CMP.Nos.11187 & 11188 of 2023
Triuchy Royal Steels,
A proprietorship concern,
represented by its Proprietor,
Mr.Jahir Hussain Mohamed Riyaz,
No.18 Heber Road,
Beemanagar, Tiruchirappalli – 620 001. ... Appellant
Vs
1. The Deputy State Tax Officer,
Roving Squad -3, Salem,
Tamil Nadu.
2. The State Tax Officer,
Adjudication – 2,
Salem (Intelligence)
Salem, Tamil nadu ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Pattern to set
aside the order in W.P.No.15338 of 2023 dated 11.05.2023 and allow the
writ appeal.
For Appellant : Mr.B.Sivaraman
For Respondents : Mrs.Vasanthamala
Government Advocate
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page No.1/4
Writ Appeal No.1106 of 2023
JUDGMENT
(Judgement of the Court was made by Mr.SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.)
The appellant was the writ petitioner. In the writ petition,
proceedings dated 08.05.2023 were impugned. By such proceedings, the
goods of the petitioner were detained. The writ petition was disposed of
by permitting the petitioner to present a statutory appeal under Section
107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter
referred to as 'CGST Act']. The petitioner was also granted liberty to
move an application under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act for
provisional release of the goods.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the order
impugned in the writ petition is a cryptic order and does not contain
sufficient reasons warranting detention. Consequently, he states that
interference is warranted by this Court.
4. On examining the order passed by the Writ Court, it is evident
that the Writ Court took note of the fact that the order impugned therein
is subject to a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2/4 Writ Appeal No.1106 of 2023
also noticed that Section 129 of the CGST Act enables the appellant to
seek provisional release of goods subject to fulfilment of conditions
specified therein. The appellant has completely failed to establish that
there is any infirmity in the impugned order warranting interference by
us.
5. Consequently, the Writ Appeal is dismissed by affirming the
order passed by the Writ Court. As a corollary, it is open to the appellant
to approach the appellate authority under the CGST Act within a period
of ten(10) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also
open to the appellant to file an appropriate application under Section 129
of the CGST Act before the second respondent for provisional release. If
such application is filed, the same may be considered expeditiously.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
(C.V.K.,J.) (S.K.R., J.)
17.05.2023
mp/vsg
Index: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes/No C.V.KARTHIKEYAN., J.
and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.3/4 Writ Appeal No.1106 of 2023
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.
mp/vsg
To
1. The Deputy State Tax Officer, Roving Squad -3, Salem, Tamil Nadu.
2. The State Tax Officer, Adjudication – 2, Salem (Intelligence) Salem, Tamil nadu
Writ Appeal No.1106 of 2023
17.05.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4/4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!