Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.D.Poonkodi vs P.K.Balasubramanian
2023 Latest Caselaw 3320 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3320 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2023

Madras High Court
M.D.Poonkodi vs P.K.Balasubramanian on 28 March, 2023
                                                                       CRP.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of
                                                                                             2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 28.03.2023

                                                       CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                           C.R.P.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of 2023
                                                          and
                                          CMP.Nos.6664, 6754 and 6722 of 2023

                     1. M.D.Poonkodi
                     2. M.D.Kalaimathi                              ... Petitioners
                                                       (in C.R.P.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of 2023)

                                                          /Vs/

                     1. P.K.Balasubramanian
                     2. Deepa Deva Priya
                     3. M.Dhanakodi
                     4. S.Lakshmi
                     5. M.D.Thirunavukkarasu
                     6. D.Murugan
                     7. M.D.Thennarasu
                     8. M/s. Lakshmi Gold Coconut Oil Industries,
                        Represented by its Partners M.Dhanakodi
                        S.Lakshmi, M.D.Thirunavukkarasu,
                        D.Murugan and M.D.Thennarasu            ... Respondents

                                                       (in C.R.P.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of 2023)

                     COMMON PRAYER : Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of
                     Constitution of India, seeking direction to the Principal District Court,
                     Dharmapuri to decide the EA.Nos.16, 17 and 18 of 2020 in EP.No.42 of

                     1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                CRP.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of
                                                                                                      2023

                     2018 in OS.No.127 of 2017 before proceeding with the execution process in
                     EP.No.42 of 2018 in OS.No.127 of 2017.


                                        For Petitioners            : Mr.V.Athikesavan

                                                    COMMON ORDER
                                  These petitions have been filed to direct the Principal District Court,

                     Dharmapuri to decide EA.Nos.16, 17 and 18 of 2020 in EP.No.42 of 2018

                     in OS.No.127 of 2017 before proceeding with the execution petition in

                     EP.No.42 of 2018 in OS.No.127 of 2017.



                                  2. The Revision Petitioners herein are the third parties to the execution

                     proceedings/ daughters of the first defendant preferred these revisions by

                     stating that the property which is sought for sale by the Decree Holder in

                     EP.No.42 of 2008 in OS.No.127 of 2017 is ancestral property in which they

                     are also having a share, but, ignoring their shares, their father and brothers

                     entered into a compromise decree with Decree Holder. Based on that, now

                     the Decree Holder is taking steps to sell the property to realize the suit claim.

                     Further more, he is also taking steps to bring the entire property to realize

                     the decree amount. Infact, the portion of the property is sufficient even

                     assuming that the Judment Debtors are liable. So, they filed application

                     2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           CRP.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of
                                                                                                 2023

                     seeking to implead themselves and also claiming their right by filing an

                     application under Section 47 of CPC in EA.Nos.16, 17 and 18 of 2020.

                     Inspite of those applications, the executing Court insisted the Judgment

                     Debtor to make payment and if they do not make payment, the Court will

                     proceed          with the auctioning of the property without deciding their

                     applications and if the executing Court make such order, the right over the

                     property will be defeated. Hence, the revision petitioners sought direction to

                     decide their applications in EA.Nos.16,17 and 18 of 2020 in EP.No.42 of

                     2018 since the direction is sought against the executing court notice to the

                     respondents is ordered to be dispensed with.



                                  3. A perusal of EA.No.16, 17 and 18 of 2020 are pending, all these

                     three years without any final disposal. However, the case status submitted

                     by the revision petitioner reveals that the executing Court is insisting the

                     Judgment Debtors to make payment and the case is posted for payment

                     without deciding the applications filed by these petitioners. Therefore,

                     direction was given to the executing Court to dispose the EA.Nos.16, 17 and

                     18 of 2020 filed by the revision petitioners within three months from the

                     date of receipt of a copy of this Order. Thereafter, the executing Court is

                     3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             CRP.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of
                                                                                                   2023

                     permitted to proceed with the main execution petition. Since the direction

                     sought against the Court, notice is dispensed with.



                                  4. Accordingly, these Civil Revision Petitions are ordered. No costs.

                     Consequently, connected misceallenous petitions are closed.



                                                                                  28.03.2023

                     Vv



                     Note: Issue Order Copy on 10.04.2023


                     To

                     1. The Principal District Court,
                        Dharmapuri.




                                                                             T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of

Vv

C.R.P.Nos.884, 904 and 896 of 2023 and CMP.Nos.6664, 6754 and 6722 of 2023

28.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter