Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karuppasamy vs The State Represented By
2023 Latest Caselaw 1983 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1983 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2023

Madras High Court
Karuppasamy vs The State Represented By on 7 March, 2023
                                                                                   Crl.R.C.(MD)No.142 of 2014



                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    Date : 07.03.2023

                                                       CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                       Crl.R.C.(MD)Nos.24 and 42 of 2017

                     Karuppasamy                             ... Petitioner in Crl.R.C(MD) No.24 of 2016

                     S.Parameswari                           ... Petitioner in Crl.R.C(MD) No.42 of 2016

                                                       Vs.
                     The State represented by
                     The Inspector of Police,
                     “Q” Branch CID Police Station,
                     Madurai City, Madurai District.
                     (Crime No.1 of 2007)                                 ... Respondent

in both cases

COMMON PRAYER : These Criminal Revision Cases are filed under

Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the judgment

dated 22.10.2016 passed in C.A.No.9 of 2015, dated 22.10.2016 on the

file of the VI Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai, modifying

the judgment dated 12.01.2015 passed in C.C.No.232 of 2008 on the file

of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Madurai and set aside the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.G.C.Rishwanth

For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor ( in both cases) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.142 of 2014

COMMONORDER

These Criminal Revision Cases are filed to set aside the judgment

dated 22.10.2016 passed in C.A.No.9 of 2015, dated 22.10.2016 on the

file of the VI Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai, modifying

the judgment dated 12.01.2015 passed in C.C.No.232 of 2008 on the file

of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Madurai.

2.The respondent registered the FIR in Crime No.1 of 2007

as against the petitioners and others for the offences under Sections 463,

471, 473 and 420 of IPC and after completing the investigation, filed the

final report. The petitioner in Crl.R.C(MD)No.24 of 2017 is arrayed as

Accused No.2 and the petitioner in Crl.R.C(MD) No.42 of 2017 is

arrayed as Accused No.1.

3.The respondent police filed a case in C.C.No.232 of 2008

as against the accused on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II,

Madurai. The gist of the charge was that the first accused/Parameshwari

and her Son Balamurugan travelled from Srilanka and stayed at

Tamil Nadu as refugee. The third accused/Balamurugan involved in a

case of smuggling materials for L.T.T.E. He was arrested and lodged in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.142 of 2014

Special Camp at Chengalpatu. In order to release of his son from the

camp, the first accused along with the second accused, who is none other

than the son in law, with common intention, prepared the Birth

certificate, Driving License, School Certificate, by forging signatures of

other person and claimed that his son is an Indian citizen.

4. After trial, the Trial Court convicted the accused 1 to 3 and

acquitted the fourth accused. Aggrieved by the same, the accused 1 to 3

preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.9 of 2015 on the file of the Additional

Sessions Judge, Madurai. The Appellate Court acquitted the third

accused from all the charges and confirmed the conviction as against A1

for the offence under Sections 466 and 471 of IPC and A2 for the offence

under Sections 466, 471 and 473 of IP. Aggrieved by the same, the

revision case is filed.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the

petitioners already undergone incarceration for a period of 5 months and

71 days. Though this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order

passed by Courts below, this Court is inclined to reduce the sentence

alone. Accordingly, the conviction passed by the Courts below as

against the petitioners are confirmed and insofar as the sentence imposed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.142 of 2014

as against the petitioners by the Courts below is concerned, the sentence

is reduced to the period which was already undergone by them.

Accordingly, these Criminal Revision Cases are partly allowed.

07.03.2023

NCC : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Index : Yes/No cp

To

1.The VI Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai.

2.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Madurai.

3.The Inspector of Police, “Q” Branch CID Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai District.

4.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.142 of 2014

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.(MD)No.142 of 2014

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J., cp

Crl.R.C.(MD)Nos.24 and 42 of 2017

07.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter