Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7169 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.No.18739 of 2023
Easwaran ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The District Collector,
Namakkal,
Ernapuram & Post,
Namakkal District.
2.The Sub Registrar,
Sendamangalam,
Sendamangalam Taluk,
Namakkal District.
3.Muthulakshmi
4.Nachimuthu Gounderr ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records on the file of the 2nd
respondent in Refusal Check Slip No.RFL/1/Sub Registrar/Namakkal/30/2022
dated 21.04.2022 and quash the same and consequently directing the 2nd
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
respondent herein to register the court Decrees in common order passed by this
Court in A.S. 1038/ 2012, A.S. 124/2013, 226/2014 and S.A. 717/ 2016 dated
01/09/2021, within a limited time frame, without insisting on the limitation period
of 4 months provided under Sec. 23 of the Registration Act, 1908.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Kabilan
For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran
Additional Government Pleader
*****
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the refusal cheque slip issued
by the 2nd respondent, refusing to register the decree that was submitted by the
petitioner on the ground that the same is barred by limitation provided under
Section 23 of the Registration Act, 1908.
2.Heard Mr.I.Kabilan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
and Mr.S.Ravichandran, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on
behalf of the 1st and 2nd respondents.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that 2nd respondent
initially refused to register the document on the ground that the property has not
been properly described in the decree. This issue has been sorted out by the
petitioner and the property description has been given to the 2nd respondent.
Thereafter, the 2nd respondent once again refused to register the decree on the
ground that it is barred by limitation as provided under Section 23 of the
Registration Act, 1908. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been
filed before this Court.
4.The issue involved in this present writ petition is squarely covered by the
earlier judgments of this Court in S. Sarvothaman Versus The Sub-Registrar,
Pondicherry reported in 2019 2 CWC 314 and M.Rajendran vs. The Inspector
General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate,
Pattinapakkam, Chennai – 600 028 & Others reported in 2021 3 LW 602. This
Court has categorically held that registration of a decree is optional and therefore,
limitation will not apply. The same shall be kept in mind by the 2nd respondent and
if there is no other discrepancy in the decree, the same shall be registered by the 2 nd
respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
ssr
5.In the result, the refusal cheque slip dated 21.04.2022 is set aside and
accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.
27.06.2023
Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral citation:Yes/No ssr
To
1.The District Collector, Namakkal, Ernapuram & Post, Namakkal District.
2.The Sub Registrar, Sendamangalam, Sendamangalam Taluk, Namakkal District.
W.P.No.18739 of 2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!