Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Vettuvanam Mahalakshmi ... vs The Superintendent Of Police
2023 Latest Caselaw 5935 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5935 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 June, 2023

Madras High Court
M/S.Vettuvanam Mahalakshmi ... vs The Superintendent Of Police on 12 June, 2023
                                                                           WA No.1000 of 2021

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED:   12.06.2023

                                                       CORAM

                            THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA , CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                          AND
                                       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

                                                  WA No.1000 of 2021

                     M/s.Vettuvanam Mahalakshmi Cultural Association,
                     reg.No.150/2016,
                     rep. By its President S.Mathan
                     Thatangukuttai Village (kilKrishnapuram)
                     Tippasamudram Madura,
                     Anaicut Taluk 635809
                     Vellore District                        ... Appellant

                                  versus

                     1.The Superintendent of Police,
                       Sathuvachari
                       Vellore District.

                     2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                       Palavansathu, Vellore,
                       Vellore District.

                     3.The Inspector of Police (Law and Order)
                       Pallikonda Police Station,
                       Pallikonda Post, Vellore District     ...       Respondents


                     Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set
                     aside the order dated 27.11.2020 in WP No.16653 of 2020.



                     Page 1 of 8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                     WA No.1000 of 2021

                                  For the Appellant        :: Mr.M.R.Thangavel

                                  For the Respondents      :: Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan,
                                                              Additional Government Pleader


                                                           JUDGMENT

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Heard Mr.M.R.Thangavel, learned counsel for the appellant and

Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Additional Government Pleader, for the

respondents.

2. The appellant assails the order of learned Single Judge dated

27.11.2020 in WP No.16653 of 2020, thereby dismissing the writ

petition.

3. In the writ petition, appellant/petitioner had prayed for the

following relief:

“Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents, their men, agents and officials from interfering with the legal activities of the petitioner club including playing of 13 cards game like Rummy with stakes whatever

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.1000 of 2021

and also from harassing the members guests or the members of the management of the petitioner club in any manner and for other incidental relief.”

4. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition.

5. We do not find any error on the part of learned Single Judge

in dismissing the writ petition, in view of the prayer made therein.

The appellant wanted its activity of game like rummy to be played

with stakes. The same was rightly negatived.

6. A Division Bench of this Court in Director General of Police,

State of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, vs. Mahalakshmi Cultural Association

rep.by its Secretary, (WA No.2287 of 2011), under its judgment

dated 22.03.2012, has observed thus:

“24. On the basis of the above discussions, we arrive at the following conclusions:-

(1)The game of rummy (13 cards) is only a game of skill even though an element of chance is also involved.

(2)In the event rummy is played by the members or the guests without stakes, the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.1000 of 2021

provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are not attracted.

(3)In the event rummy is played by the members or the guests with stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are attracted.

(4)In the event the club/association either allows its members or guests to play rummy with stakes or make any profit or gain out of such gambling, the Police has the authority to invoke the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act.

(5)In order to ascertain as to whether the premises is used as a gaming house for gambling, the Police is entitled to invoke Section 23 of the Act.

25. In view of the above, we modify the order of the learned single Judge and dispose of the writ appeal with the following directions:

(1)The respondent-Association shall not indulge in any activity by allowing its members or the guests to play rummy (13 cards) with stakes and make profit or gain.

(2)The Police are entitled to take action in the event any illegal activity is carried on in the association premises.

(3)In respect of the FIR registered by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.1000 of 2021

Police against those 56 persons and others who were said to have indulged in illegal gambling activity as per the raid conducted on 10.08.2011, it is open to the Police to proceed further as per law and it is for the Association, its members and their guests to defend the same in the manner known to law, as the criminal action was initiated after a valid raid conducted on 10.08.2011 by the Police.

(4)The Police shall not disturb the respondent-Association frequently under the guise of inspection without there being any reliable information as to the illegal activities of the association or its members or the guests.”

7. Our attention was also drawn to the judgment of another

Division Bench of this Court in WA No.296/2013 dated 06.10.2017,

(The Director General of Police, Chennai vs. S.Dillibabu), for a similar

ratio.

8. In light of that, the appellant cannot be permitted to indulge

in activity by allowing its members or guests to play rummy (13

cards), with stakes.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.1000 of 2021

9. In the event rummy is played by the member or guests of

the appellant without stakes, then the provisions of the Chennai City

Police Act would not be attracted.

10. With this observation, the writ appeal is disposed of. There

will be no order as to costs.

                                                           (S.V.G., CJ.)             (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                           12.06.2023
                     Index                   : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation        : Yes/No
                     tar







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.1000 of 2021

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sathuvachari Vellore District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palavansathu, Vellore, Vellore District.

3.The Inspector of Police (Law and Order) Pallikonda Police Station, Pallikonda Post, Vellore District

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No.1000 of 2021

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(tar)

WA No.1000 of 2021

12.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter